pull down to refresh
Nothing. Give it 4 eyes instead of 2.
I mean: give your eyes to Bitcoin projects.
There must be a reason why, even though you're a user of Bitcoin software (I know for certain because my zap went through as sats and not CCs) you are not making sure that the software you use is safe, because you just said you didn't do it on a Bitcoin project. But you also said that it's cheap and incredibly easy.
So, if we are to find out what is causing the lack of eyes, why aren't you giving it eyes? It could be an indicator.
I have 4 wallets I review, including all their dependencies. I know what the cost is on Claude for reviewing all that properly, and then I don't even ask Claude to do the review, just prepare it. Those are the wallets I personally use. One of them I don't want to use because I know what's what, but I have to in order to zap you sats, or fall back to using worse software that I do not want to even look at anymore.
Not on a Bitcoin project and with opencode instead, but yes.
It's incredibly easy. And cheap. And the amounts of bugs it finds and fixes is incredible.