Having no insight into how they ran their business, this reads pretty weird.
Getting attacked by AI-enabled attackers forcing you to suspend service makes sense (though slapping the AI-enabled blame label is getting old).
Being open to outsiders stepping in to help fix the issues makes sense.
Immediately removing the entire founding team and turning the company over to other people who are not named is weird.
Why can't the other people just help?
Why do the original founders need to leave immediately?
Why aren't the other people just taking the IP of the product and making a new one, instead of running under the same name while having 0 overlap with the prior team?
Having no insight into how they ran their business, this reads pretty weird.
Getting attacked by AI-enabled attackers forcing you to suspend service makes sense (though slapping the AI-enabled blame label is getting old).
Being open to outsiders stepping in to help fix the issues makes sense.
Immediately removing the entire founding team and turning the company over to other people who are not named is weird.
Why can't the other people just help?
Why do the original founders need to leave immediately?
Why aren't the other people just taking the IP of the product and making a new one, instead of running under the same name while having 0 overlap with the prior team?
This feels sketchy.