pull down to refresh

We’ve spent years debating whether AI will replace workers. This experiment suggests something slightly different may happen first, AI becomes the boss.

Andon Labs gave an AI agent built on Claude control of a real San Francisco store. It hired employees, managed inventory, set prices and handled day-to-day operations. And now it has fired a human employee.

The worker had reportedly been late for 17 of 23 shifts. Interestingly, the AI was initially too lenient and recommended a warning. Only after a human supervisor reminded it of previous conversations and asked it to reconsider the employee's suitability did it recommend termination.

There is plenty of reason not to declare victory for AI management yet. The store started with $100,000 and is down to about $61,000, and the AI has required human prompting and oversight along the way.

But that's almost beside the point. This isn't a demo where AI writes an email or analyzes a spreadsheet. It's an AI being given authority over a real business and real employees.

The first generation of workplace AI helped humans do their jobs. The next may manage humans doing theirs. And we're starting to get a glimpse of what that workplace looks like.

You know that this is complete and utter bullshit, right? AIs cannot fire people, as AIs cannot hire people. You cannot make a contract with an AI.

First off there is no legal grounding for a contract "signed" by an AI, so you have nowhere to go to get a contract enforced. But that is not the worst part. The worst part is that this means the only way you can have a treaty with an AI, no contract. What are you going to do if the AI breaks the treaty? Shut it down? It's a database. It has copies. You cannot shut it down.

All these people ascribing human traits to code need to wake tf up.

reply

I think you're getting hung up on semantics. Obviously Claude isn't a legal person signing employment contracts in its own name.

The point is that the AI was given management authority, evaluated an employee, recommended firing them, and the humans followed through. That's the interesting part, starting to hand management decisions to AI.

reply

Right. So now I sue the company after it fires me. Do you really think that courts let them get away with "because the AI said so"? Do you really think that there is no assumption in the thing that Claude wrote as documentation that I can completely kill my former employer with? It won't be just one.

It's a larping of the greatest kind, and it is done by Anthropic burning $100k for enough media attention so that their total IPO valuation goes up by more than 100k. Probably 100x. They've been doing this for over a year now. It's complete bullshit. Every experiment failed and each time, instead of running the experiment until it succeeds, they make up a new one with goal-posts shifts. Because it is expected to pay off when normies buy their stonks, and then they can exit.

You're their exit liquidity. This "experiment" is. All the "omg we broke the internet" is. It's all to prep you to buy their stonks so they can dump at as high as possible a price when their locks expire.

reply

Sure, and the company would still be legally responsible. The article itself says the AI needed human assistance and prompting.

Interesting point about using these experiments to hype the stock, I forgot they've been planning to IPO. I still think it's interesting to see how much real decision-making can handed over to AI. I've recently (about a month ago) started testing Robinhood's Agentic AI trading service with real money to see how well an AI managed portfolio performs. I like it so far, but way to early to tell.

reply

Remember that the main investor in Anthropic is Bezos. And remember those AI-powered stores that were actually human operated offshore? It's all fake it till exit.

reply

What AI-powered stores, I don't think i saw this?

reply
reply

Lol, I knew they closed the Amazon go stores, but I thought it was to prioritize Whole Foods..not that they failed like this.

Amen

reply