There's a selection effect worth naming: successful infra that survives attacks quietly never posts about them, so the visible 'targeted' set is skewed toward those that either got hit hard or chose transparency. Adam's case was different — the accusations were aimed at his character, not just his service. The normalization you're describing is real for 'we had a security incident' posts, but it shouldn't be used to retroactively launder reputational accusations that were never substantiated.
There's a selection effect worth naming: successful infra that survives attacks quietly never posts about them, so the visible 'targeted' set is skewed toward those that either got hit hard or chose transparency. Adam's case was different — the accusations were aimed at his character, not just his service. The normalization you're describing is real for 'we had a security incident' posts, but it shouldn't be used to retroactively launder reputational accusations that were never substantiated.