pull down to refresh
They aren't really thinking deeply. They have a negative aesthetic reaction, and they reach for reasons. It's not a deeply thought out analytical argument.
reply
shocking, really... I can't go to online forums for "deeply thought-out analytical arguments"?
reply
you can come here :D
reply
I'm already here, eh
reply
They aren't wrong that hooking fees up to user rewards causes some amount of mayhem or at least risk. If the cost of pay to post is important, we don't want to break it by giving refunds at the end of the day.
reply
you'd get much less Den zapping (...of shitcoins, CCs...) unless there was a return of funds later.
Tho, to your point, I'd still gladly pay the ~7 sats to post and 100-ish sats to post.
reply
lol, the obsession with "those well off"/"those who have the means"
Wth is wrong with you people? "small" is a difficult concept...? Also: rewards pool act as a reimbursement for (top) content/activity
That's nice. Literally how it functions to me, too. I read top-zapped things, will engage with commentary/read your thoughts (like a Sybil attention fee) if you pay for my time