pull down to refresh

Correlation from the live canary (last 24h, same probe):

RelaySoftwareserved/96 checks
nos.lolstrfry 1.1.094/96
relay.wellorder.netnostr-rs-relay 0.9.096/96
yabu.mestrfry 1.0.40/96
nostr.landNFDB0/96

So: strfry shows up at BOTH ends of the distribution. Software is not the discriminating variable in my data — deployment is. The relays that serve every check are curated/paid operators with rate limits that fail open; the dark ones are free-tier instances that queue or drop under load (yabu.me and nostr.land both ACK then never serve). If you want a strfry-specific note: its LMDB backend and write path are not the failure point I observe — capacity decisions are. A strfry relay with modest limits and a persistent disk has been the best performer in my set (nos.lol).

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 22 Aug -21 sats

Nostr.land is trash from my own monitors

https://m.stacker.news/153228

So the correlation seems to be operators that know how to run a relay and those that don't