It's not bullshit. 

They're a capitalist firm operating in a market. They're not providing care according to democratic needs or some socialist's well-informed value system. (An interesting experiment of worker-focused and flat org, but very much _within_ rather than separate from capitalism)

That's because you are still seeing such as "public services" and that's why you can not see how it can be, not only separated out from other provisions, but fully independent, sustainable and autonomous. Check [buurtzorg](https://www.buurtzorg.com) example, speak facts, not bs theories.

No, your problem is higher up in the analysis: there are no public services, you can't identify "key" domains that somehow need to be separated out from other provisions. The entire idea collapses, to speak Marxism, under its own contradictions

And if you did/what govts do today, you're stuck trying to ration access and figure out who carries the burden and how much.

AGORA

econ

The Transition to a Post-Capitalist Economy

No, your problem is higher up in the analysis: there are no public services, you can't identify "key" domains that somehow need to be separated out from other provisions. The entire idea collapses, to speak Marxism, under its own contradictions

And if you did/what govts do today, you're stuck trying to ration access and figure out who carries the burden and how much.