pull down to refresh
Buurtzorg operates in a market, yes. Worker-owned, self-managed, no external shareholders extracting profit. The surplus stays with workers, reinvested in care. Better outcomes at lower cost than the Dutch bureaucratic system. Can you see what's making the difference?
These models prove you can organize production around human needs and get better results. But of course, by your imperialist standard metrics, this doesn't compute. I don't blame you. There's nothing personal here.
than the Dutch bureaucratic system.
government-supplied/paid-for health care isn't anywhere close to the capitalist themes of markets, commerce, production mediated by prices. Knock me over with a feather
"Imperialism," like all your other buzzwords, is unimportant and irrelevant. (Also: archaic: the 19th Century statism called and wants its ideology back)
It's not bullshit.
They're a capitalist firm operating in a market. They're not providing care according to democratic needs or some socialist's well-informed value system. (An interesting experiment of worker-focused and flat org, but very much within rather than separate from capitalism)