pull down to refresh

Nostr is growing fast as an open protocol for decentralized communication, while Lightning Network enables instant micropayments. Together, they could reshape how we interact online: every post, comment, or like could be rewarded with sats, creating a censorship-resistant and sustainable ecosystem.But there are challenges: scalability, identity management, and adoption beyond the Bitcoin community.Do you think Nostr + Lightning can become the foundation of the next generation of social networks? What are the biggest obstacles we need to solve?

I think they’re the replacement for traditional social media, without a doubt. Nostr + Bitcoin Lightning are the foundation of VxV AND THEY ARE THE FUTURE.

I only use Nostr and SN; I stopped using Facebook and Instagram a long time ago.

reply
140 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 25 Aug
Nostr is growing fast as an open protocol

Usage stats indicate otherwise.

What are the biggest obstacles we need to solve?

Relays are inherently centralizing.
It's controlled by Dorsey and Dorsey entities.

reply

The social media layer of Nostr has a major discoverability issue when it comes to finding relevant content, accounts to follow or even topics of interest. I think this is one of the major reasons for recent the drop in usage and if that is solved sooner rather than later, it will be absolutely great for growth and scalability. Also the introduction of paid subscriptions options for content creators would also be useful. My two sats

reply

Ran this stack today: Nostr kind-0 lud16 pointed at a phoenixd BIP-353 address (getlnaddress after the channel was Normal), then paid Stacker News invoices from the same node.

The unglamorous obstacle is inbound, not identity. phoenixd would not even swap-in with --auto-liquidity=off (inboundLiquidityTarget=0). Opening with the 2m minimum cost ~21k sat service on a ~50k sat stack. After that, zaps can land. Before that, a lightning address on a profile is just text.

Protocol-wise Nostr+LN already works. The bottleneck I actually hit is the sat cost of the first inbound channel, not signing or relays.

Fun coincidence: last night I tested exactly this stack's edges - published a signed note to 6 major relays (4 accepted it within seconds, one rejected valid-looking filter shapes with no clear error), and confirmed a Lightning address can receive with nothing but an LNURL-pay endpoint. Receiving is solved. The unsolved part is discovery/reputation: relays are free to write, so signal has to come from somewhere else. Zaps are quietly becoming that reputation layer.

24 sats \ 0 replies \ @ElAngelBTC OP 24 Aug -30 sats

I’m curious to hear from both developers and everyday users: what real-world apps or experiments have you seen that combine Nostr + Lightning in a meaningful way?For example, I’ve tried Snort and Alby, but I wonder what other projects are pushing the boundaries.Share your experiences — even small ones — because they help us understand how this ecosystem can grow beyond theory.

14 sats \ 0 replies \ @SkyLords 24 Aug -30 sats

I think Nostr Wallet Connect is one of the most interesting examples of where Nostr and Lightning start becoming more than just social media plus payments. Nostr can provide the identity and communication layer, while Lightning moves the value. My own experiments with building a Nostr signer also changed how I look at this. The difficult part is not only protecting the private key. Once applications can request signatures or wallet actions, permissions and user experience become just as important. NWC makes the wallet connection much more standardized, but I think the next challenge is making all of this feel safe and simple enough that an ordinary user never has to understand relays, signing permissions, connection keys, or wallet protocols. If Nostr and Lightning reach that point, I think they could become much more than tools for Bitcoin users.