pull down to refresh

CCs are just fine for SN. I really do not understand this madness of attaching external wallets.

If SN was only CCs, we could do it with a database. I don't think you would really even need Bitcoin to make such a system: everyone could just buy CCs with a creditcard or PayPal or something. Such a system is nowhere near as interesting as sending sats from my wallet to another stackers.

Do you really not see any value in attaching a wallet?

reply
Do you really not see any value in attaching a wallet?

NONE. SN is just a game like WoW - you pay (with credits) to play.
Anybody that sees SN just as a source of assmilking sats to an external wallet is a scammer.
As I said many times but people do not pay attention to my words: SN is a marketing platform, not a faucet. If you can use it wisely it can be very useful, because is pay to post.

Remember that I always said: remove the rewards system from SN #796213

Bitcoin adoption is NOT driven by SN system...

reply

You are so full of bullshit.
If Bitcoin is not used as a MoE it will remain just a speculative commodity.
SNs is an ideal model to show how sats can be used as a MoE
You wank on about living on the bitcoin standard but you cant be fucked to actually help make it happen.
You are a big talk no walk HYPOCRITE.

reply
Bitcoin adoption is NOT driven by SN system

I fully agree with you. But I think SN adoption is driven by Bitcoin, and trying to make the experience of using Bitcoin on SN less confusing is good.

I will accept that Spark may not be "making using Bitcoin in SN less confusing" -- but it is clear to me at least that the way we do Bitcoin on SN so far is very difficult for new people.

reply
I fully agree with you.

Stacker News drove my bitcoin adoption, which is basically an existence proof to the contrary.

reply