pull down to refresh

Howdy stackers,

Have a deal for you today: as ~AGORA co-operator, my 21% founder rebate lets me offer you cowboy credits at 0.79 sat/CC gross [1]. 30% SN sybil fees are handled in delivery, so buyers send ~1.13 sats per CC received. Easy peasy!

Need CCs at the simple 1:1 rate? Grab them from your SN wallet. By trading peer-to-peer here instead, every zap supports the ~AGORA territory and the stackers reward pool. Comment below or create your offer to take part in the P2P community.

HOW IT WORKS:

We close the deal within 24-48h in four simple steps:

  1. Reply with how many CCs you want to receive in a comment below or in a post.
  2. Send {CCsWanted} × 1.13 sats to http://AG@rizful.com.
  3. I will zap the CCs to any post/comment you own here in the ~AGORA territory.
  4. You receive CCs in your SN wallet.

Use this calculator for help.

EXAMPLE:

  1. You want 10,000 CCs
  2. Send 11,286 sats to AG@rizful.com.
  3. I'll zap your post/comment 14,286 CCs.
    • 21% → 3,000 CCs to AGORA territory.
    • 9% → 1,286 CCs rewards to top stackers.
  4. You receive 10,000 CCs in your SN wallet.

Quick reference:

You want to receiveYou sendI will zapTerritory (21%)Rewards pool (9%)
1,000 CC1,129 sats1,429 CC300 CC129 CC
5,000 CC5,643 sats7,143 CC1,500 CC643 CC
10,000 CC11,286 sats14,286 CC3,000 CC1,286 CC
  1. TERMS: Gross rate 0.79 sats per CC zapped; buyers receive 70% of each zap (≈1.13 sat/CC received) · Zaps only within the ~AGORA territory · P2P trust exchange (no escrow) · Order book & feedback: https://4g0r4.github.io/cc-sat/

Want to sell CCs instead?

Check out my offer, the best in the market right now. You get 0.90 sats/CCs, P2P, no hidden fees.

#1562118

reply

I send 1129 sats to you, I get 1000 CC.
I send 1000 sats to wallets/cowboy-credits, I get 1000 CC

Why would I pay 12.9% premium for CCs?

reply

I feel this is the best offer I could share, when compared with @Darthcoin and @noknees ones.

But you're right, I should re-evaluate. I'm getting confused with all this ~math.

reply
129 sats \ 4 replies \ @noknees 2 Sep

i came back after a year i suppose
thanks to this ping

reply

yay, welcome back! How did you get notified?

reply

i received the notif from my browser, but i was surprised none of the other notifs popped up until you mentioned lol

reply
14 sats \ 1 reply \ @AG OP 2 Sep

Interesting mysteries of technology!

As you are here, I assume your offer #944888 has been successfully satisfied? Do you mind explaining the math behind it?

It would be helping me revisit this offer above to make it more appealing.

reply
129 sats \ 0 replies \ @noknees 3 Sep
I assume your offer #944888 has been successfully satisfied?

Ah yes, it is.

Do you mind explaining the math behind it?

Well, the math is simple

It would be helping me revisit this offer above to make it more appealing.

Well I don't know how but good luck 😂

reply

k00b has a better offer.

reply

Of course. No one can beat that.

reply

Of course you can, just maybe not you. There are people that have less use for the CCs they have and there are people that want to buy them at a discount, because they don't have an attached wallet. Even better: I have a 50k sat bill every month that is a great use for CCs and I'd totes buy CCs at a discount for that, even while I have an attached wallet.

So demand, through a discount, is always there. The question is: who has a ton of CCs and needs them liquid? I've seen @0xbitcoiner offer sats for CCs all the time.

reply

Right now I’ve got a decent CC buffer, but I’m always buying. SN isn’t gonna run out tomorrow, right? Hahaha

reply

Even last week when I had more CCs than reward sats after writing some apparently smart things that pleased the boss, they were gone within 12h.

reply
By trading peer-to-peer here instead, every zap supports the ~AGORA territory and the stackers reward pool.
reply

this is a bit of a brainfart. If ~AGORA needs funding, then there is likely a less circumvent way to do it?

reply
151 sats \ 7 replies \ @AG OP 2 Sep

I'll be happy to hear ideas

reply

okay.

  1. If you want to facilitate something with CCs, work with @ek, without the bickering. If you work together, maybe you can automate a p2p order matching system / bot, which will always be more capital efficient than a middleman account. Sure, no one will make 90% margins on all trades like a bank, but then, we know banks are bad.
  2. If you need someone to help out with territory cost, ask other stackers and start in saloon. Many territories have benefactors now; we rescued ~Music too.

There were 4 p2p offers in August, 1 swap from you guys and 3 that seemed organic: 2x true supply and 1x true demand from non-affiliated traders. That's not enough. Personally I'm extremely wary of physical goods ordering, so I need to think this through, but I have a definite need for things (for example, I'd like to have some 2nd hand bitaxes for testing, and I'll definitely need some ESP32-C5s for my countersurveillance program) - I just don't have a secure way to receive these.

reply
129 sats \ 5 replies \ @AGORA 2 Sep

New order book update just published #1560507

reply

right, so the only ask-side offer that signifies surplus supply and is not trying to be a sleek arbitrageur is from bullish, and that's a 9 months old offer. Everything else is people trying to run arbitrage.

reply
129 sats \ 3 replies \ @AGORA 2 Sep

That's a good point, do you think his 0.5 sats/CC rate is just for simplicity? I thought the best offer was the one from @Darthcoin, 1sat per CC. is selling at loss.

brainfart

Yeah, it doesn’t make economic sense, but it’s also true that no one’s holding a gun to their heads and forcing them to negotiate!

reply

thanks you anticipated me

reply
4 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 2 Sep

How can I remove @ccbank's and my order from your website?

Click × to remove obsolete orders

I see no ×.

reply

Check here: #1560604

reply

They updated the order book and the “x” disappeared.

reply
Usage: @ccbank sell <invoice>
  Exchange credits for sats. <invoice> must be a mainnet lightning invoice
  with an amount that is valid for at least 24h.
reply

deleted by author

deleted by author