pull down to refresh

Ok make sense, make sense. I was trying to incorprate 0x feedback #1560542

Let me see how I can merge both ideas. I like the fact to have negative spread, that could be reflected in the chart too.

That works but then you have to normalize both sides (like for the spread graph)

I like the fact to have negative spread, that could be reflected in the chart too.

Yes, it's important information because it means bidder (a) should talk to asker (b)! (or someone arbs it.)

PS This is why I think that the top 2 deals aren't real/actual, because no way Undisc would have let those free sats sit there for 9 months: take the deal from bullish, then convert back useless CCs by selling them to darth... your only ante is 2x LN fees, which will be covered by the gains on the deal from bullish.

reply
PS This is why I think that the top 2 deals aren't real/actual, because no way Undisc would have let those free sats sit there for 9 months: take the deal from bullish, then convert back useless CCs by selling them to darth... your only ante is 2x LN fees, which will be covered by the gains on the deal from bullish.

Wow, inside arbitrage. I never tougth it would be even possible.

PS I think I found a way to merge it all

reply

I think it's still wrong based on your screenshot, haha.

Bid should be at the bottom in the order it is now, ask at the top in reverse order of what you have right now. This is also what @0xbitcoiner shows.

That way the truth is in the middle: on the bid side, the best deal is closest to the middle bar (i.e. on the top of bids), and on the ask side, the best deal is also closest to the middle bar (i.e. at the bottom of asks)

reply

ok I will invert the order of the bids too. But still I feel the bids should be at the top-left and the asks at bottom-right

reply