pull down to refresh
It’s just a matter of aesthetics and data consistency. I don’t see any problem with leaving it like this. In an exchange order book, the “sats” column never repeats values, it combines all the volume at a given price. One thing that would definitely look better is matching the buy/sell orders.
Ok this make sense. And I was thinking to build it exactly like this from a traditional stand. From a stacker perspective I feel like the Buy orders will be more a thing here, and that's why I moved at the top, and the sell offers, in an inverted order, at the bottom.
Check latest deployment.
I prefer it this way.
I just had an idea for grouping identical orders: combine all the volume at the same price and only show the total amount for that price. Then, when you click on the order, it expands and shows who submitted it, along with the amount for each individual order.
Volume is something I excluded from the variables because to have correct metrics, then it would be mandatory to track all trades. For example, for @ccbank he has a daily variable rate, and volume is defined by demand. I thought that placing a 1CC volume for all orders would be a way to avoid such detailed tracking.
I like the idea of the expandable line to display all individual orders.
I’d like to point out a few inconsistencies and things that could be improved. It’d be great if buyers and sellers could say how much they want to trade.