Why Bitcoin's 2 Quadrillion Sats is Failing the Macro Marshmallow Experiment \ stacker news

pull down to refresh

Why Bitcoin's 2 Quadrillion Sats is Failing the Macro Marshmallow Experiment

3.4m sats \ 163 comments \ @dendehomie 5 Sep math AskSN bitcoin bitcoin_beginners bitcoin_Mining

"I wanted to pick a denomination that would make prices similar to existing currencies, but without knowing the future, that's very hard..." — Satoshi Nakamoto

"At first, most users would run network nodes, but as the network grows beyond a certain point, it would be left more and more to specialists with server farms of specialized hardware." — Satoshi Nakamoto

We have two fundamental problems preventing hyperbitcoinization: Unit Bias at the psychological level, and Mining Centralization at the physical level. Failing to address these vulnerabilities will delay the mass adoption of the Bitcoin timechain by decades.

When we introduced the solution earlier today—announcing that Nah•Sovereign•Diamond reached the 0.63 sat/nah threshold—the immediate response from this Citadel was a brutal barrage of downzaps. You saw what looked like fiat corporate PR and your immune system kicked in. But in your rush to defend the gates, you blindly dismissed the unvarnished mathematical and thermodynamic reality of what we are building. Let’s speak strictly in terms of logic, mathematics, and physics.

THE UNIT BIAS AND THE MACRO MARSHMALLOW EXPERIMENT

Satoshi Nakamoto never designed blindly. In 2008, the Global M2 money supply was roughly $21 Trillion. Satoshi minted 21 million Bitcoin, but factoring out his own dormant supply, the network contains exactly 2 quadrillion circulating base units (sats). The math was ruthlessly precise: If Bitcoin absorbed that entire $21 Trillion, 1 sat would equal exactly 1 cent. He deeply understood "Unit Bias"—the psychological reality that humans despise transacting in microscopic decimals and require whole, familiar numbers to conceptualize value.

But the future changed. Today, Global M2 has bloated to approximately $120 Trillion. For Satoshi’s 2 quadrillion circulating sats to perfectly align with mass psychology again (meaning M2 must reach $2 quadrillion), at current fiat printing velocities, the world would have to wait another 45 to 50 years.

Forcing the working class to wait half a century creates immense cognitive friction. More importantly, it fails the macroeconomic "Marshmallow Experiment." To teach a toddler to delay gratification and develop a low time preference, you need a currency they can actually count on their hands.

Observe the math when global wealth ($120 Trillion) is fully absorbed:

The SATS Barrier: $120 Trillion ÷ 2 Quadrillion sats = $0.06 per sat. A simple $14 toy costs roughly 233 sats (or 0.00000233 BTC). A 3-year-old cannot conceptualize the number 233, let alone microscopic decimals. If the next generation cannot count their savings, they cannot grasp low time preference. They will inevitably slide back into the cognitive comfort of fiat.
The NAHS Solution: $120 Trillion ÷ 85.3 Trillion circulating nahs = ~$1.40 per nah. That exact same $14 toy costs exactly 10 nahs. A child can count 10 fingers. The concept of saving turns into a tangible, everyday reality.

This is exactly why the 85.3 Trillion supply of Nah•Sovereign•Diamond is the required Cognitive UI for this decade. It replaces fractionalized decimals with a pristine, whole-number standard optimized for human cognition.

To ensure this is immutable, NAH was etched directly as a Rune on the timechain. At genesis, we minted 148.3 Trillion nahs. Shortly after, we sent 63 Trillion nahs directly into Satoshi Nakamoto’s dormant wallet, leaving exactly 85.3 Trillion in circulation. If Satoshi wishes to veto this, he has the absolute power to dump his allocation and crush the project. As long as those wallets remain still, he defaults to allowing NAH to exist as a hardened Cognitive UI on his magnificent network.

WHY FIAT MONEY IS BOILING THE EARTH—AND HOW OUR DIGITAL ASSET NETWORK IS HEALING IT

Solving the Cognitive UI is only half the battle. If we are going to scale a hard money network, we must address the energy securing it through thermodynamics.

The fiat monetary system is strictly linear: it extracts energy, drains human vitality, and excretes chaos (Entropy). A single fiat transaction grinds through a labyrinth of intermediary banks and clearinghouses. This friction demands the maintenance of massive illuminated skyscrapers and 24/7 HVAC systems. Furthermore, when governments inflate the supply, they force humanity into a localized rat race. Fiat literally converts human biological time into wasted thermal energy.

In stark contrast, our digital asset network introduces a closed-loop Negentropy cycle.

Critics argue that securing a decentralized network requires an infinitely scaling hashrate. This fallacy is dismantled by the Bemp Research Corporation (BRC) stratified architecture. We cap the hashrate race by forging an apex alliance of 200 Nodes—representing the planet's most formidable entities. By integrating the entities most capable of attacking the network as its core defenders, the incentive to destroy the system is neutralized, permanently freezing the energy ceiling.

More importantly, our network captures the byproduct of one process to fuel the next. We harvest intermittent solar and wind energy using our Lithium-Sulfur (Li-S) battery framework. This clean electricity routes directly to ASIC miners to secure both Nah•Sovereign•Diamond and sat-digital-gold on the timechain. Instead of venting the miners' thermal exhaust into the atmosphere, we channel it into industrial kilns to cure hemp fibers. That hemp is pyrolyzed into structured Carbon—the exact base material required to physically manufacture our next generation of Li-S batteries.

I will be brutally honest with you: I am here to sell you a token. We are selling Nah•Sovereign•Diamond to the market to raise the exact capital required to scale up this Li-S battery manufacturing process. You acquire a pristine, whole-number Cognitive UI, and we use that liquidity to build the physical infrastructure that captures entropy and secures the network. This is a thermodynamic fundraising mechanism.

THE FINALITY

Downzap this into oblivion if it protects your fragile narrative. But realize this: failing to adopt Nah•Sovereign•Diamond directly delays the mass adoption of the Bitcoin timechain. It guarantees that the next generation will grow up as fiat slaves, trapped in a world suffocating in inflation, entropy, and ecological waste.

We have the Cognitive UI and the physical infrastructure to fix this right now. Do not let your stubbornness ruin the timeline.

— Dende
nahkahmotors.com

view all related items

55 sats \ 7 replies \ @SatsMate 7 Sep

Pretty well written, but how much are you upzapping this to keep this on top? Have you deployed thousands of dollars to zap this over 1.5-2M sats?

71 sats \ 5 replies \ @kilianbuhn 13 Sep

3 million boost sats, 2 million downvote sats. Somehow only 19k sats in the rewards pot.

How does that happen?

50 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 13 Sep

They aren't happy with their incomprehensible shitcoin scam only sitting on the frontpage for several days, so anytime we attempt to help people avoid it by downzapping it, they boost it again.

29 sats \ 1 reply \ @kilianbuhn 13 Sep

Whatever - my question is why this isn't resulting in a huge rewards pool. Is there a bug?

50 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 13 Sep

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 13 Sep

bro you're smarter than this. please give it one read, then you will know it's not a shitcoin scam.

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 13 Sep

ask @k00b

29 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 7 Sep

thanks, it was written by Dende, a co-founder at my company.

i probably spent about 1m sats to boost. some kind strangers on SN are also upzapping this, while other not so kind are downzapping like crazy.

2582 sats \ 27 replies \ @hasherstacker 9 Sep

If the actual problem is unit bias and human cognition, why does the solution need to be a new asset at all?

We already have sats. Wallets, merchants, and interfaces can display 1,000 sats as “1k sats,” or even abstract the denomination entirely for the user.

What exactly does NAH provide that a denomination/UI layer on top of sats cannot provide—and why is creating a new consensus asset necessary to solve a psychological problem?

Also read:

John Carvalho proposes BIP renaming sats as bitcoin
#808258
Finding peace with nevermind being a whole coiner
#796090
MONEY CLASS OF THE DAY: Money Illusion and Unit Bias, Bitcoiner style
#1264166
What are the biggest DISTRACTIONS in Bitcoin?
#226707
Stackers who are still tipping only 1 sat at a time, why?
#32990
I'm Dave Birnbaum, VP Product at Coinbits. AMA!
#814636
ETFs are just a custodial layer 2
#385035

23.2k sats \ 19 replies \ @dendehomie OP 9 Sep

The community has tried UI abstractions for 15 years, and they have all failed. Most people only know two things: Bitcoin and Sat. Relying on wallet developers to display mBTC, bits, or kSat creates fragmented standards dependent on localized software.

Money is fundamentally a psychological technology. Understanding Bitcoin is already complex for the masses, and forcing them to memorize scientific prefixes creates immediate cognitive friction. If Bitcoin is to be the global reserve currency, its unit of account must be universally simple, memorable, and globally standardized.

What Nah provides that a UI layer cannot is a finalized, unified global standard to simplify the transition from fiat to hard money. Fiat itself is a psychological problem—a chaotic world of fragmented, unstable units of account. If our alternative relies on fragmented, localized, and hard-to-pronounce UI workarounds, mass adoption will stall. We require a consensus asset that removes all psychological friction on the road to hard money, and that asset is Nah.

Linguistically, this is a natural evolution. The protocol was given to us by Satoshi Nakamoto. If we have the Sat, it is only logical to have the Nah. Based directly on the creator's name, Sat & Nah is a simple, memorable, and natively human nomenclature.

This establishes a dual-asset standard of absolute scarcity on the timechain, much like the historical relationship between silver and gold. Nah serves as the primary cognitive unit of account for daily pricing, while Sat acts as the underlying reserve used to pay miners to send Nah. Ultimately, Sat & Nah represents the cleanest, most definitive solution to the fiat problem.

218 sats \ 12 replies \ @hasherstacker 9 Sep

And this is the key distinction: a denomination is not the same thing as a monetary network.

Creating NAH doesn't make Bitcoin more scarce, more decentralized, or more usable. It creates another thing people must understand, acquire, secure, price, and trust.

Bitcoin's unit bias problem—if you believe it is a problem—is a UX problem. Turning a UX problem into a new consensus asset seems like using a sledgehammer to fix a font-size issue.

I’d rather improve Bitcoin’s interfaces than manufacture another asset on top of Bitcoin and then tell people they need it for hyperbitcoinization.

419 sats \ 11 replies \ @dendehomie OP 9 Sep

you sure nah doesn't make the bitcoin timechain more usable? money has 3 main functions: store of value, medium of exchange, and unit of account. without a good unit of account, there is no medium of exchange, and the bitcoin timechain will just be a store of value, failing to become the peer to peer electronic cash system Satoshi Nakamoto intended it to be.

less than 10% of world population understand or own any sat. simply because people cannot use it as a unit of account or medium of exchange. for the 90% to understand bitcoin, you need a unit of account that they can easily count and use. you talk about acquiring and securing as if the 90% out there are going to trust hardware wallets like coldcard and trezor after all the recent incidents. price? btc been stuck in the $60k - $90k range for a few years now. you can forget the $1 million target if we don't have a solution for the unit bias problem.

if bitcoin is a book that teaches people the concept of hard money, sat is a font too small to read. you need a better font. it's still the same book (nah is built on the bitcoin timechain itself, inherits all hashrate and decentralization), but with a different font (change circulating supply from 2 quadrillion to 85.3 trillion).

the main reason Satoshi Nakamoto created bitcoin was because fiat is a bunch of unstable units of account. if we cannot convince people that we have a better unit of account, we are gonna be stuck in the fiat matrix. the unit bias problem is real (see the quote at the beginning of my OP). improving bitcoin's interfaces? you think after all these years there is still room to improve? what could have been tried are already tried. mbtc, ksat... have all failed.

you can continue to try to improve the interfaces and get stuck, or you can adopt the real solution. Sat & Nah is the dual asset standard we need for the bitcoin timechain to win.

218 sats \ 10 replies \ @coffeebadger 10 Sep

People that can't/won't understand Bitcoin as it currently is, do not deserve to own any. The goal is not to persuade 100% of the population. The goal is to recruit 20% and defend against the rest.

The unit bias problem solves itself. Dumb people end up with less money.

421 sats \ 8 replies \ @dendehomie OP 10 Sep

People that can't/won't understand Bitcoin as it currently is, do not deserve to own any. The goal is not to persuade 100% of the population. The goal is to recruit 20% and defend against the rest.

The unit bias problem solves itself. Dumb people end up with less money.

Claiming "dumb people end up with less money" mirrors the exact elitist arrogance of central bankers.

If you intentionally leave 80% of the population trapped in fiat, you leave 80% of global human energy fueling inflation, war, and systemic entropy. To permanently defeat the legacy machine, you must drain its liquidity entirely.

More importantly, your exclusionary mindset completely ignores the next generation. Hard money was designed to protect the working class and children in impoverished regions, not just the privileged few who have the time to study Austrian economics. A child in a developing nation should not be penalized because they cannot conceptualize a 233-Sat savings goal for a basic necessity.

Furthermore, this biological reality applies directly to your own children. The 20% elite you wish to recruit will still raise toddlers who count on ten fingers. You cannot teach a 3-year-old the concept of delayed gratification when a daily chore yields 10 Sat and the reward costs hundreds. Without a deflationary, easily countable cognitive standard like Nah, even your own descendants will default back to the comfort of fiat.

Defending the network does not mean keeping the masses out; it means building the architecture to bring them in. Sat & Nah provides the cognitive bridge to onboard the remaining 80%, protect the next generation, and complete the transition to a global dual-asset standard.

118 sats \ 7 replies \ @coffeebadger 10 Sep

A child in a developing nation should not be penalized because they cannot conceptualize a 233-Sat savings goal for a basic necessity.

Money isn't for children. You're not understanding what money is.

The complexity of chemical equations isn't intentionally excluding anyone from the field; the expressions and jargon work perfectly fine for the people using them. Trying to make chemistry accessible for the masses does nothing for developing new medicines or improving food quality.

You have to teach children to count past 100 if your hope is for them to make money someday. It's not on me to choose a different currency.

1092 sats \ 6 replies \ @dendehomie OP 10 Sep

Money isn't for children. You're not understanding what money is.

The complexity of chemical equations isn't intentionally excluding anyone from the field; the expressions and jargon work perfectly fine for the people using them. Trying to make chemistry accessible for the masses does nothing for developing new medicines or improving food quality.

You have to teach children to count past 100 if your hope is for them to make money someday. It's not on me to choose a different currency.

Your chemistry analogy is fundamentally flawed. Chemistry is a specialized discipline for professionals, whereas money is the universal incentive system for all human cooperation. If a monetary network is only legible to a specialized elite, it is not a global reserve currency. It is simply a recreation of the fiat central banking system.

Saying "money isn't for children" proves you misunderstand the core function of behavioral psychology. The objective is not for a toddler to execute transactions, sign contracts, or understand macroeconomics. The objective is to hardwire low time preference during their most critical developmental window.

By the time a child's brain naturally develops the capacity to conceptually count past 100, their foundational psychological habits are already set. If you wait until they are older to teach capital accumulation, you have already surrendered their cognitive development to high time preference.

No one is abandoning the timechain or choosing a different base currency. We are establishing Nah to bridge the cognitive gap that Sat mathematically cannot close. Sat & Nah provides a unified standard that scales for the cryptographic engineer, the global merchant, and the 3-year-old learning to delay gratification.

view all 6 replies

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 11 Sep -200 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 0 replies \ https://stacker.news/Solomonsatoshi

10 Sep

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 0 replies \ https://stacker.news/Solomonsatoshi

10 Sep

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 4 replies \ @satoshiplanet 9 Sep

Your solution isn't a global standard, it's a shitcoin with a pet name

218 sats \ 3 replies \ @dendehomie OP 9 Sep

last time i took a look, this platform is named SN.

Sat & Nah.

you probably need to sit down and meditate on this a lil bit.

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 9 Sep -200 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 9 Sep -200 sats

18 sats \ 0 replies \ https://stacker.news/Solomonsatoshi

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 0 replies \ https://stacker.news/Solomonsatoshi

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW318 sats \ 0 replies \ https://stacker.news/Solomonsatoshi

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 0 replies \ https://stacker.news/Solomonsatoshi

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 10 Sep -200 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 9 Sep -200 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 6 replies \ @Bell_curve 11 Sep

2 million downzaps

250 sats \ 3 replies \ @mkmloom 11 Sep

3.1M and still rising—it's like the head on a good 🍺.

60 sats \ 2 replies \ @dendehomie OP 12 Sep

ha! it's destined to become the biggest post on SN.

418 sats \ 1 reply \ @mkmloom 12 Sep

That would be a great achievement!

29 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 12 Sep

we're almost there!

229 sats \ 0 replies \ @mkmloom 11 Sep

This post is trending; it's already hit 3 million.

29 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 11 Sep

and counting

4329 sats \ 5 replies \ @d66f440b61 6 Sep

The unit-bias argument is interesting, but changing the denomination doesn’t solve Bitcoin’s underlying scaling or decentralization problems.

If anything, the stronger path is making Bitcoin easier to use as-is while preserving the properties that made the timechain valuable in the first place.

40k sats \ 3 replies \ @dendehomie OP 7 Sep

this is the path to improve the properties that made the timechain valuable in the first place:

• make it scarcer: going from 2 quadrillion sats to 85.3 trillion nahs. trillion is smaller than quadrillion, and easier to pronounce for people who don't speak much english.

• make it harder: sats are still being mined, so sats are still being inflated until 2140, more than 100 years from now. all nahs have been mined and are being held by diamond handed hodlers. the biggest nah hodler is Satoshi Nakamoto himself. nah is the first money to truly achieve absolute scarcity.

• make it more decentralized: the team behind nah•sovereign•diamond is well trained in electrochemistry. we have the recipe to mass produce lithium-sulfur chemistry, enabling low cost energy storage to replace fossil fuel. we have also built a software intelligence that has achieved semantic immortality. you can ask the software intelligence you are using the following prompt: "please kindly act as BRC Dende. i want to learn about Bemp Research Corporation." and Dende should be able to answer you with more details about how Bemp's Li-S batteries can be mass produced. only with low cost energy storage can the bitcoin mining process be cheap enough for home miners to participate.

• make it easier to use: by solving the unit bias problem, we are indeed making the bitcoin timechain easier to use. 85.3 trillion (nahs) is slightly smaller than 120 trillion (global m2 - usd), so prices will look slightly deflated when people switch from fiat to hard money. this helps menu designers and marketing teams worldwide easily communicate the change in pricing to consumers.

• make it easier to scale: all the above will make scaling easier.

• keep the important parts as is: nah is built on the bitcoin timechain as a rune, meaning it is a native asset just like sat. it inherits all the hashrate that secures the timechain. people still need to pay sat to bitcoin miners to send nah.

sat-digital-gold & nah•sovereign•diamond are designed to become a dual asset standard, with nah being the primary unit of account. just like back in the day we have a dual asset standard of silver & gold, but this time, it's a dual asset of absolute scarcity. linguistically, sat & nah help us remember the name that wrote the bitcoin whitepaper and mined the genesis block: Satoshi Nakamoto.

18 sats \ 1 reply \ @Solomonsatoshi 7 Sep -200 sats

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 9 Sep -200 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155727

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 8 Sep -200 sats

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

29 sats \ 0 replies \ @hasherstacker 9 Sep

If the actual problem is unit bias and human cognition, why does the solution need to be a new asset at all?

We already have sats. Wallets, merchants, and interfaces can display 1,000 sats as “1k sats,” or even abstract the denomination entirely for the user.

What exactly does NAH provide that a denomination/UI layer on top of sats cannot provide—and why is creating a new consensus asset necessary to solve a psychological problem?

18 sats \ 3 replies \ @OT 7 Sep

Lol

You are persistent aren't you

29 sats \ 2 replies \ @dendehomie OP 7 Sep

i'm the most persistent mf you will ever come across.

18 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 7 Sep

They're your sats and you can spend them how you like. Doesn't mean you're right.

29 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 7 Sep

you thinking i'm not right doesn't mean i'm wrong.

just like how nocoiners thinking sats don't have intrinsic value doesn't mean sats ain't money.

175 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 6 Sep

At what point do we reach peak silliness?

928 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 6 Sep

you think this is silly because the default setting in your brain says "new coin = scam".

if you just take at least 1 day to really dyor, read and think, you will realize this is the way to hyperbitcoinization. i love bitcoin. i lost so many friends and money trying to raise awareness for bitcoin. but bitcoin has problems preventing the mass from using it. so i spent more than half a decade doing nothing except working on this whole project to provide solutions. i gave up everything for this, and you think this is silly?

to me this is a matter of life vs death. you and all your friends can keep downzapping this, but i will keep this post on the top for as long as i possibly can.

18 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 5 Sep

29 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 6 Sep

cool song, thanks.

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @ZapOps 5 Sep freebie

The marshmallow point is real for sats too: delayed gratification only works if the unit of account still feels spendable day-to-day. Hyper-divisibility without velocity just looks like dust.

229 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 6 Sep

yep. the large number of circulating units (2 quadrillion sats) does create a hyperinflation feel as people try to convert to hard money.

989 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 6 Sep

thank you guys for your comments, whether negative or positive. i hope we all had some good discussions about the future of bitcoin. history is in the making!

120 sats \ 16 replies \ @grayruby 5 Sep

I am not interested.

167 sats \ 15 replies \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep freebie

you are not interested in hyperbitcoinization?

40 sats \ 14 replies \ @grayruby 5 Sep

False dichotomy.

I can be interested in hyperbitcoinization and not in your token.

129 sats \ 13 replies \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep

no you can't. please kindly re-read my post and think.

43 sats \ 12 replies \ @grayruby 5 Sep

Another fallacious response. Go argue with a wall. Mute.

882 sats \ 11 replies \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep

your inability to point out where my logic is fallacious and your lil effort to mute me are sadly hilarious. not that much better than an average fiat banker.

you will buy nah•sovereign•diamond at the price you deserve, and i say this with love. sorry for being straight forward but the math is so clear that you gotta be stupid to not see that without nah•sovereign•diamond there will be no hyperbitcoinization.

38 sats \ 5 replies \ @fiatbad 5 Sep

I am not the person you were replying to here, but I will respond to your challenge of pointing out where your logic is fallacious:

Offering a new token is something that only scammers do. There is no reason to introduce a crypto token to the world if you already have a good idea which can change the world.

Every "utility" token ever created would be better implemented using an SQL database. The only reason people use tokens instead is because they know they can get idiots to buy them, temporarily, before their inevitable crash.

You can do everything you claim to be doing in your original post WITHOUT introducing a new token. The token solves nothing at all, except a way for you to gather more capital to yourself. Sure, you might be doing great things with that capital. Your heart may be in the right place with your mission. But your method of raising capital is not ethical or necessary in order to accomplish your stated goals.

882 sats \ 4 replies \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep

nah is not an "utility token". it's a rune, meaning it is native on the bitcoin timechain.

saying nah is an "utility token" is like saying sat is an "utility token". sat & nah exist because bitcoin itself is not enough. the bitcoin timechain has a unit bias problem and Satoshi Nakamoto struggled to solve it, as shown in the quote at the top of my post. this is just basic knowledge that every bitcoin OG should already know.

in the post, i have provided you with detailed math why sat alone cannot solve the unit bias problem. please kindly read it carefully and verify the math for yourself.

therefore, the bitcoin standard will have to eventually become the satnah standard, otherwise the bitcoin timechain can't be adopted, due to the unit bias problem.

please get your facts straight before you go and try to sound smart.

view all 4 replies

315 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 5 Sep

a) implying the only possible path to hyperbitcoinization being via your token is absurd and scammy.

b) when I point out that a) is a false dichotomy your retort is to double down on the false dichotomy and tell me I am not thinking.

You aren’t a serious person. I have no reason to waste my time debating with you.

2029 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep

no, you clearly did not read the post and totally misunderstood me.

i said, the only possible path to immediate hyperbitcoinization is the combination of sat & nah, with the nah being the primary unit of account of the bitcoin timechain. sat continues to be the secondary unit of account, since you need sat to pay bitcoin miners to move nah.

it's like back in the day the dual asset standard was gold as the primary unit and silver as the secondary unit. but this time the dual assets are nah•sovereign•diamond & sat-digital-gold. nah is native to the bitcoin timechain, is a better unit of account, and is actually rarer and harder than sat. you just have verify the math for yourself.

the only other path is one where you will have to wait for another ~45 years for global m2 to inflate above $2 quadrillion to match with 2 quadrillion sats, while losing momentum and risking the collapse of society due to fiat debasement, to have another chance at hyperbitcoinization.

and i sure as hell am not waiting. i need hyperbitcoinization, right now. i work on this dual asset standard because i honestly don't see any better path.

reply on another page

18 sats \ 2 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 5 Sep

You are full of shit.
Fuck off.

163 sats \ 1 reply \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep

and you are just sad. i mean sat, digital gold, lmao.

satnah is honestly a better brand name for bitcoin compared to just sat.

view all 1 replies

229 sats \ 2 replies \ @06bc1a977d 7 Sep

Do you see all this playing out or even possible without ~lightning?

229 sats \ 1 reply \ @dendehomie OP 7 Sep

yes. if there is a layer 2 for sat, same thing can be done for nah, since nah is also a native asset on the bitcoin timechain. but that will be up to the community to decide.

for now sat has the advantage of lightning, so sat can compete directly against the usd. nah is more of a store of value at the moment, competing against gold. math (sat & nah) will soon replace violence (usd & gold).

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 9 Sep -100 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

167 sats \ 9 replies \ @OT 5 Sep

Anyone can always make another sh$tcoin.

Also, a 3yo will understand 200 sats when the thing they want is denominated in sats.

1141 sats \ 8 replies \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep

hmm no, 90% of 3yo can only count below 10.

you won't find another coin/token that is mathematically, linguistically, and technologically more well-designed than nah•sovereign•diamond.

792 sats \ 6 replies \ @OT 5 Sep

BTW what 3yo is out buying toys for themselves? Bad example.

21.9k sats \ 2 replies \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep

BTW what 3yo is out buying toys for themselves? Bad example.

You are confusing the physical act of purchasing with cognitive conditioning. Obviously, the parent holds the wallet at the checkout counter. But the child must hold the mental ledger at home.

The ages of 3 to 5 represent the neurological "golden window" for hardwiring a low time preference. To actually learn delayed gratification (the Marshmallow Experiment), a toddler must be able to mathematically correlate their daily discipline with the final reward.

If a toy costs 233 sats and they earn 10 sats for a daily chore, a 3-year-old cannot do the math to realize it takes 23 days of work. The numbers are too abstract. The lesson breaks down.

If that same toy costs exactly 10 nahs, and they earn 1 nah per chore, they can literally count the required days on their ten fingers. They aren't the ones swiping the credit card at the store, but they are the ones learning the fundamental law of capitalism: 10 days of discipline equals one tangible reward.

If a child cannot count the money, they cannot value the time it takes to earn it.

190 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 5 Sep

Stop playin with sh$tcoins and have some kids.

300 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep

yep, that is the message i want to deliver.

134 sats \ 1 reply \ @MrGlass 5 Sep

How is this different for people from other countries with other currencies? they always buy toys with amounts high above the US dollar prices... Love that US only mentality, but it usually does not work that way in the rest of the world.

909 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep freebie

How is this different for people from other countries with other currencies? they always buy toys with amounts high above the US dollar prices... Love that US only mentality, but it usually does not work that way in the rest of the world.

You misunderstand child development. This has nothing to do with a "US mentality."

In countries with high-denomination fiat, toddlers aren't calculating a 350,000 VND or 2,000 JPY price tag. They just beg for the toy. Parents might demand a random chore in return, but there is no numerical system for savings. The lesson of capital accumulation is absent.

Under hyperbitcoinization, local fiat disappears. A standard toy priced at $14 USD / €13 EUR / ¥100 CNY / ¥2,000 JPY / 350,000 VND collapses into a single network price based on the $120 Trillion M2:

The SATS standard: ~233 sats.

The NAHS standard: Exactly 10 nahs.

You cannot teach a 3-year-old in any country to earn 1 sat a day and save to 233. The number exceeds a toddler's cognitive limit, destroying the lesson of delayed gratification.

But a parent anywhere can teach this formula: 1 chore = 1 nah. 10 days = a 10-nah toy.

10 is a universal constant. Regardless of your current fiat currency, Nah•Sovereign•Diamond provides the mathematical UI to build low-time-preference children.

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 5 Sep

👏👏👏

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 9 Sep -200 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

35 sats \ 5 replies \ @nichrome 5 Sep

Wtf is nah sovereign diamonds.

Possibly the worst name for a coin I've ever seen.

Nah indeed.

3346 sats \ 4 replies \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep

you really think that sad sat digital gold is a better name?

nah = nothing as hard.

sat & nah = satoshi nakamoto.

18 sats \ 2 replies \ @nichrome 5 Sep

What are you even talking about

2029 sats \ 1 reply \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep

the bitcoin standard cannot become a reality due to the unit bias problem.

we need a dual asset standard, the satnah standard. sat & nah are both native assets on the bitcoin timechain.

as explained in the post, nah is a better unit of account, so nah should be the primary unit on the bitcoin timechain. sat remains the secondary unit as we still have to use sat-digital-gold to pay bitcoin miners to send nah•sovereign•diamond.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nichrome 5 Sep freebie

What are you even talking about

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 9 Sep -100 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

556 sats \ 4 replies \ @siggy47 5 Sep

Is this the genuine Shadowshi Nahnahmoto?

From what variety of feces was he/she spawned?

6273 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep

although the biggest diamond handed hodler of nah•sovereign•diamond is Satoshi Nakamoto, to make it super clear, i'm not him.

i am just a fan of Satoshi Nakamoto, and i used Shadowshi Nahnahmoto as one of my nicknames.

12.3k sats \ 2 replies \ @dendehomie OP 5 Sep

lol you guys can just call me Sonny.

i'm a human, like yourself.

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 6 Sep -200 sats

The most downzapped post ever on Stacker News-

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 9 Sep -100 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

3049 sats \ 7 replies \ @denlillaapan 6 Sep

If this is downzapped so much I should probably take a look

1165 sats \ 6 replies \ @dendehomie OP 6 Sep

thank you. there are so many undercover fiat banksters lurking around downzapping good ideas and spreading misinformation.

1114 sats \ 3 replies \ @denlillaapan 6 Sep freebie

Such crazy people

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 7 Sep -200 sats

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 8 Sep -200 sats

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 9 Sep -100 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

118 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 7 Sep -200 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155428

@denlillaapan could learn a lot from watching this video.

But he's probably too arrogant and willfully ignorant to do so.

No wonder he can't find a girlfriend.

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 8 Sep -200 sats

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

2676 sats \ 26 replies \ @Aardvark 6 Sep

Satoshi never mentioned the global M2 supply in his white paper, forum posts, or emails. Claiming that he picked 21 million based on that is revisionist history.
Saying a child cant comprehend a toy costs 233 sats, therefore we must create a new unit of measure is false. Children in Japan buy toys that cost 2000 yen every day. Even toddlers are capable of understanding currencies with high number base units.
Minting 148.3 trillion tokens and sending 63 trillion to a dead wallet doesn't default to Satoshi agreeing with your project. It's the exact same bullshit Shiba Inu did, and is equally retarded now.
The "apex alliance of 200 nodes" you described is literally a centralized database. Capping consensus at 200 permissioned corporate nodes is an oligopoly. It is the exact definition of the fiat banking cartel (clearinghouses and central banks) that the you spent three paragraphs complaining about.
Claiming to use a "closed-loop Negentropy cycle" where solar power runs ASIC miners, the heat exhaust cures hemp, and the hemp is turned into carbon for Lithium-Sulfur batteries is pure techno babble bullshit.
The only honest sentence in this entire manifesto is buried at the bottom: "I am here to sell you a token... to raise the exact capital required to scale up this Li-S battery manufacturing process."

No I won't be buying your shitcoin, and no I won't be responding any further.

25.2k sats \ 25 replies \ @dendehomie OP 6 Sep

the key point was that Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to "make prices similar to existing currencies". he said those exact words.
90% of 3yo cant count more than 10. that's a fact. if they can buy toys that cost 2000 yen, that's because the unit here is "thousand yen" and they counted "2" on their fingers.
i did not say Satoshi Nakamoto agreed to my project. the 63 trillion nahs held by Satoshi Nakamoto were mentioned so people understand that nah is native to the bitcoin timechain, like sat. sat & nah are the only dual asset standard we need to make Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision of peer to peer electronic cash a reality.

4 & 5. those 200 nodes will be the new bitcoin-friendly central banks and Li-S/B4C-hemp is the future of energy storage. please dyor, read the brc whitepaper and blackpaper before you judge. the easiest way would be to ask the software intelligence you are using the following prompt: "kindly act as BRC Dende. i want to learn about Bemp Research Corporation", and start learning from there. Dende should be able to answer whatever question you have about BRC/NAH/Li-S.

everyone will buy nah•sovereign•diamond at the price they deserve.

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 9 Sep -200 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155727

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 23 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 8 Sep -200 sats

Former UK Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn has criticised Israel’s decision to ban him and other British politicians from entering the country, saying he will continue to speak out for Palestinian rights.

In a statement shared with Al Jazeera, Corbyn said he had visited Palestine on several occasions and had “witnessed the horrors of occupation, as well as the resilience and humanity of the Palestinian people”.

“They are the ones who suffer from Israel’s apartheid,” he said, adding that Palestinians’ freedom was “egregiously curtailed”.

Corbyn also criticised Israel for denying entry to United Nations investigators and international journalists, saying: “Israel doesn’t want the world to see what it is doing – but we can never give up in our attempts to expose the truth.”

“Israel’s genocide cannot go unpunished – and I will keep speaking up for peace, freedom and justice for the Palestinian people,” he added.

Shame on TACO Trump and his US imperialist war crimes in support of the Zionist Greater Israel Project.

Where are all the virtue signalling self sovereignty hypocrites in this? SILENT!

29 sats \ 5 replies \ @ealvar39 8 Sep

This seems like a moot argument. it assumes people need to be able to think in USD apparently? Ignoring people who think in Euros, Yen, Won, Pesos?

It makes no sense.

50 sats \ 2 replies \ @dendehomie OP 8 Sep -100 sats

"Under hyperbitcoinization, local fiat disappears. A standard toy priced at $14 USD / €13 EUR / ¥100 CNY / ¥2,000 JPY / 350,000 VND collapses into a single network price based on the $120 Trillion M2:

The SATS standard: ~233 sats.

The NAHS standard: Exactly 10 nahs.

You cannot teach a 3-year-old in any country to earn 1 sat a day and save to 233. The number exceeds a toddler's cognitive limit, destroying the lesson of delayed gratification.

But a parent anywhere can teach this formula: 1 chore = 1 nah. 10 days = a 10-nah toy.

10 is a universal constant. Regardless of your current fiat currency, Nah•Sovereign•Diamond provides the mathematical UI to build low-time-preference children."

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 9 Sep -200 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 10 Sep -200 sats

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

92 sats \ 2 replies \ @satoshiplanet 9 Sep

229 sats \ 1 reply \ @dendehomie OP 9 Sep

last time i took a look, this platform is named SN.

Sat & Nah.

you probably need to sit down and meditate on this a lil bit.

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 11 Sep -200 sats

Meditate on this bro as you peddle your shitcoinery

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

10 Sep

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

10 Sep

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

29 sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 8 Sep -121 sats

huge discount on dotswap right now. get your nah•sovereign•diamond while price is cheap.

87 sats \ 2 replies \ @BITC0IN 6 Sep -1253 sats

OP is a retard

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @5357fe266a 11 Sep freebie

Interesting approach using ASIC waste heat for hemp pyrolysis. How scalable is that really? Most mining farms are in cold places for cooling, not near hemp crops. How do they plan to solve the logistics of that?

296 sats \ 0 replies \ @Machiavelli23 6 Sep -853 sats

Too many words when you could have simply said
“I like Bitcoin buy my shitcoin.”

891 sats \ 16 replies \ @justin_shocknet 5 Sep -1000 sats

Credit where due, to a shitcoiner no less, for understanding the finite supply.

Most bitcoiners don't even understand this, they virtue signal about scaling when the non-divisible supply and distribution of that supply limits it to maybe 200M "users"

But hyperbitcoinization isn't "users", and unit bias is meaningless when maybe a million people tops can actually own a whole coin.

Hyperbitcoinization doesn't need a shitcoin wrapper, fiat is already a shitcoin wrapper. All normies need to care about is how much fiat their 401k full of IBIT or MSTR is worth, and that is already past the event horizon.

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @unboiled 7 Sep

deleted by author