Ask me anything, I have a long time to answer questions.
- Contributor to Wasabi Wallet
- Ranked #9 on Stacker News top spenders
- Austrian economist
- Anarchocapitalist libertarian
- Bitcoiner for 10+ years
pull down to refresh
Ask me anything, I have a long time to answer questions.
Why Wasabi and not JoinMarket?
Wasabi's coinjoins are much more blockspace efficient than JoinMarket's. However, JoinMarket has speed and flexibility advantages over Wasabi, so the ideal software would integrate both & combine their strengths: #1530076
Hey @Kruw I just updated wasabi wallet from within the app. Clicked the checkmark. Restarted it and opened up fine. I just made a transaction from Rizful to my Wasabi wallet, and I'm not exactly sure what happened but it looks like the address that I intended to send to got swapped. This is the first time this has happened. Can you please contact me so I can figure out what has happened?
shit, nevermind. That was really weird. It showed up.
Wasabi has always been great. Thank you for your service! 🙏
What's the biggest normalized scam, besides fiat currency?
Spark is a scam. They advertise their statechain product as self custody, but the operator can steal user coins.
hey kruw, what is the weirdest piece of information you remember for no reason?
Interesting question. I thought about it for 60 seconds, the best thing I could come up with is that planet Earth is slightly wider at the equator due to its rotation.
What’s something that took you by surprise when developing Wasabi Wallet? And how did you resolve it?
I'm not a developer, but one thing that surprised me was the complexity that was built on top of the transaction labeling feature - https://github.com/WalletWasabi/WalletWasabi/issues/14716
I think you like waxwing's Babilonia concept. What is standing in the way to it seeing widespread adoption on mainnet?
Also: when trustless casino?
I have not yet fully analyzed Babilonia, but waxwing is a genius, so I am already excited.
Gamblers care about two things that affect their bottom line: The trustworthiness of the house, and the house edge. I don't think there's a shortage of trustworthy casinos (they practically print money).
On chain fees cut against the profitability for trustless Bitcoin gambling at scale, so maybe Ark is a necessary prerequisite. I wasn't around for SatoshiDice when it existed, but I'm surprised that concept died out instead of evolving.
Kruw, say someone's living off-grid as much as they can: energy sovereign (solar), their own drinking water, food sovereign (fruit, veggies, animals), paid in Bitcoin, natural medicine... but there's shit they can't handle solo: a medical emergency, a forest fire, a flood, a drought that dries up their well, a plague that wrecks their crops or animals, a late frost, a machinery accident, a robbery...
In your ideal society, how does that get handled for someone like that? Who puts out the fire? Who evacuates them? Who brings water when the well runs dry? Who's got their back when someone comes to take their shit? And if the answer is 'private insurance' or 'hire an agency,' what about the ones who can't afford it?
I know this is Kruw's AMA but as a 15-year AnCap heavily into seasteading, I'd like to take a swing at this answer.
Governments own and are sovereign over every square inch of land on this planet. They have been since long before we were born, and that makes it very, very hard for anyone alive now to understand what it's like to live outside of government control.
Most people, when hearing answers that libertarians give them, will automatically imagine those answers being deployed in the world they already know; which is nothing like a world outside of govt control. They won't solve problems here in this world.
Even if you want to homestead out in the woods on land you rent from govt, then the problems you come across will still exist, and be unique to your location and distance from resources.
Questions about who puts out the fire and how to deal with public domain issues of any kind isn't hard for libertarians to answer, but it is very specific to the place they hope or plan to attempt such a free society. Their "platform" will dictate the ultimate answer. Even two different seasteads could be designed very differently and therefore call for different answers to public domain questions.
You can probably imagine that living on a fully self-sovereign seastead that has its' own courts and law would be very different from living on a seastead that is flying the flag of another country. The latter has to abide by the laws of some pedophiles thousands of miles away. Those countries have existing regulations that seastead B would have to follow, even when they don't make any sense for the locals.
As for the economic question you posed at the end, different societal systems will have different economic challenges too. What causes poverty there isn't what causes poverty on land. For a fully self-sovereign seastead with no government of any kind, I imagine something like Assurance agencies would be a very basic service that everyone will consider as important as food. Without an assurance agent to have your back you wouldn't enjoy the protections that police & lawyers offer you today.
I don't claim that this system is better in every way to what we've got, but It does allow for civilized society & public domain in a decentralized way, all without being ruled over by pedophiles & warmongers.
Why I promote seasteading: Govts aren't going to sell land to us with any sovereignty intact. That's just not something they do. We have to either build our own land, or race to some new land out in space first before we'll ever have the chance to be free.
Living off-grid isn't appealing to me at all (neither as a lifestyle or a political strategy), it's practically synonymous with poverty. As we saw with Ruby Ridge, isolation doesn't stop the government from marching their army to your doorstep in order to enforce their petty regulations.
Anarchocapitalists embrace markets and reject governments. The solution to all of the problems you listed is "money". Specializing in your own career and simply hiring a plumber, doctor, butcher, & firefighter is way more efficient than becoming a "jack of all trades".
The market for violence is a tricky one. Arguably, governments are competing against their citizens and competing against each other in the market for violence.
Emerging technology can shift the balance between attacker/defender advantage. Finally, after thousands of years of tyrants stealing livestock, crops, and gold, Bitcoin has arrived to liberate us.
Poverty is the default state of man: He is born naked, hungry, and unsheltered. Anyone who wants to avoid these conditions must work to provide for themselves, or work to provide for others and trade with them.
What is Wasabi doing to stop frontier AI models from stealing user funds?
Hey there, Wasabi dev here.
The best thing we can do is use the frontier models to fix potential bugs before attackers do. Wasabi uses NBitcoin, which is a library used across many wallet software, currently heavily scrutinized.
I'm not a developer, so I'm not the right person to ask about those specifics.
Who should I pay attention to in the world of bitcoin and privacy?
"Glass coins" (the new name for Shielded CSV) by Robin Linus seems promising for privacy.
Are coinjoins the future or a stopgap?
Both. You can open Lightning channels inside coinjoin transactions and coinjoin within Ark rounds. These protocols are not mutually exclusive.
What are the ground rules for being a bitcoiner?
Generate your own keys, run your own node, use coinjoin/lightning for privacy, and DON'T PAY TAXES.
What do you do for fun?
Doomscrolling.
I’d be interested in hearing how your experience contributing to Wasabi Wallet has shaped your view of Bitcoin privacy and self-custody.
After 10+ years in Bitcoin, what do you think is the biggest problem the Bitcoin ecosystem still hasn’t solved well — technically, economically, or from a user perspective?
And if you could change one thing about how Bitcoin is being developed today, what would it be and why?