pull down to refresh

Brzezinski declared the death of nations and the rise of a global elite

In Part 7 we saw Quigley uncover the secret society that engineered wars, weaponized diplomacy and erased itself from the history books.

Today we turn to Zbigniew Brzezinski, one of the most influential establishment thinkers of the late 20th century.

Brzezinski rose from Polish émigré to Harvard scholar, then into the White House as Carter’s National Security Advisor. Fiercely anti-Soviet, he shaped U.S. policy on China, Afghanistan and the Middle East, while earning a reputation as both strategist and provocateur.

Beyond Brzezinski's influence in Washington, his partnership with David Rockefeller in founding the Trilateral Commission cemented his role in knitting together political and corporate elites across continents (and we'll hear from David Rockefeller himself in Part 9).

Brzezinski, in his 1970 book Between Two Ages, proved remarkably prophetic. He foresaw a future of satellite broadcasting, instant global media and the decline of the nation-state in the face of multinational corporations. Most strikingly, he warned that new technologies would usher in a “more controlled society,” where surveillance and behavioral manipulation would become tools of governance.

Decades later, his "predictions" echo uncomfortably in the realities of globalization, digital surveillance and corporate dominance.

He was blunt about the decline of the nation-state, an important stepping stone towards a one world system:

‘the nation-state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: “International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-states”’

Admitting the emergence of a global elite (the dominant minority of ‘untamed’ humans described by Charles Galton Darwin):

‘Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites, but now they are composed of international businessmen, scholars, professional men, and public officials […] it is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook.’

After which he anticipated direct intervention into the human mind and body (the methods by which the masses of humanity will be ‘tamed’):

‘there is already widespread concerns about the possibility of biological and chemical tampering with what has until now been considered the immutable essence of man […] Speaking of a future at most only decades away, an experimenter in intelligence control asserted, “I foresee the time when we shall have the means and therefore, inevitably, the temptation to manipulate the behavior and intellectual functioning of all the people through environmental and biochemical manipulation of the brain”’

In the end, Brzezinski does not sugar coat the situation:

‘man’s malleability may permit what was previously considered immutable in a man to be undermined.’

The continuity across the decades is striking. Wells laid the blueprint, Sir Julian Huxley gave it a philosophy, Lord Russell described its application through education, Sir Charles Galton Darwin projected it into the future, Aldous Huxley warned of its weaponized science, Quigley revealed its financial backbone and the hidden hand driving it all.

Brzezinski tied it all together with technology – the missing piece that could make the pipe dream of global control a practical reality.

In Part 9[1] we’ll see how the Club of Rome diagnosed humanity as the disease and ask the question, could David Rockefeller’s ‘one world’ be the cure?

  1. This is the fourth of a 9-part email series sent by Nick Heys to spread his personal journey and document the open plan for world control discoveries achieved in his book reviews. I thought it would be useful to have them all archived. If you prefer to receive this content in your inbox, free of charge, simply sign up for the newsletter at ContinuityOfControl.com. ↩

Solid series, but I’d push back on treating Brzezinski’s analysis as a confession...he was a strategist describing what he saw.

reply

Indeed, confession is merely a clickbait term used to make it more attractive and interesting to readers. Even predictions are mentioned, meanwhile it is well known and documented as all being part of a plan.

reply

deleted by author