pull down to refresh

I don't care much about Tucker Carlson, about the infighting of American politics, or the topics of foreign affairs or Iran wars or whether Trumpian Republicans will be reelected, etc etc.

...but I do care about this sort of expensive, personal, features-based journalism so I will read and spread. The opening reads like a novel. Beautiful piece of, not quite “investigative” journalism but definitely journalism — of the sort out AI-fueled, clickbait-hungry, bullshit world desperately needs.The Gonzo we miss, and the Gonzo we no longer deserve

It is a long drive to Tucker Carlson’s barn in Maine, and his latest podcast on Israel’s wars makes for an odd soundtrack on the rental-car stereo as I wind my way through a landscape of placid lakes and towering pines, moose crossing road signs and more than a few lobster shacks

"It feels a long way from the city of power and privilege where Carlson made his name as a journalist and then a prolific rightwing commentator. But, in the view of the American politicians and powerbrokers he so unnerves, it’s not nearly far enough."

This bit feels like PR cope… no way somebody that much in the limelight isn’t at least aware of what he’s raking in. (No doubt there are accountants and businesspeople in his realm that could give you an exact figure on the spot.)

he launched The Tucker Carlson Show, recorded from his barn and streamed to millions over YouTube and other platforms. He says he actually doesn’t know what he earns from the show “but it seems good” and his audience is “many multiples” of what they were during his top-rated run at Fox.

When Trump, as every politician does, betrayed his promises, Carlson felt it was “perhaps the rudest awakening in his life.”

Much to the chagrin of the White House, in the midst of an election year, he has turned his podcast into a megaphone for pointed criticism of the administration, devoting hours to wrestling over the question of how he got Trump so wrong. This was a guy with “a trail of bankruptcies and personal betrayals”, Carlson reflected on a recent episode. He should have known better.


(The smart money over at @team_predyx says 1.5%)

“Does Carlson represent the vestiges of a Maga movement gone awry under Trump? Or the future of a revised conservative movement not yet realised?”

Lots of talk about midterms and energy prices leading up to it. Kind of (=largely) self-inflicted by a warmongering government misjudging its own abilities. Also:

what makes Carlson so threatening to his former party is not just his fixation on Trump’s unpopular war. It is that he believes Trump launched this war, in violation of his own principles and US interests, because Israel wanted him to. By explicitly tying a major US decision to pressure from Israel, Carlson has tapped into an undercurrent of antisemitism on the far right that the GOP would rather see sequestered
… Unburdened by a primetime TV show, Carlson tells me he no longer feels obliged to track the daily news. He has no TV in the Maine house, and no newspaper gets delivered….

Excellent. Good on him.

...and this is unlike some people we know in Bitcoinland, dazzled by fame and white houses

Excellent and necessary journalistic trait:

One of Carlson’s great skills — or flaws, depending on who is watching — as an interviewer and conversationalist is that he is able to come across as empathetic to nearly everyone he speaks with. His fans say this approach elicits more thoughtful conversation. His critics say he winds up sounding like a “useful idiot” or apologist for people with horrific views.

And also, no Tucker in a future JD Vance administration:

It’s easy to imagine a triumphant Carlson returning to Washington under a Vance presidency. But Carlson dismisses the idea and acknowledges that Vance may not be able to escape the legacy of Trump’s war, when the time comes. “It’s something I’ve thought about a lot . . . just as someone who really loves JD as a person. I feel sad about it.”

https://archive.md/Xk9vR

My first encounter with Tucker Carlson was seeing him on my parents-in-law TV. I found his somewhat frozen facial expression annoying (and I never really thought his questions were very good). From those brief glimpses, he always seemed to prefer to play a stubbornly thick-headed interviewer. I actually respect this approach as it forces the interviewee to say more than they intend sometimes.

My second encounter was when Tucker Carlson did the long interview with Putin where Putin began with a half-hour history lesson. That sure was a kick.

What I find most fascinating about him now is that he's pursuing this media empire of his outside the traditional channels. This is where everything is headed and it is interesting to watch a mega-personality make a go of it.

I don't doubt that he is making good money. I don't believe anyone's numbers about their audience size though.

And as to the statement that Trump betraying his promises was a "rude awakening" -- this has to be the stupidest thing I've ever heard Carlson say. Either he thinks his audience is dumb as a rock or he himself is.

I simply cannot believe there are high-functioning people who don't understand that Trump (like all politicians) will do whatever is most expedient to Trump's own goals and does not care about you.

reply

I'll be honest: I misread Trump 2.0. he's been much worse than I expected, and my more sanguine predictions about him have been proven wrong (compared to the more hysterical warnings from my dad)

reply

But he closed the border. We're the only Western country with a closed border.

reply
What I find most fascinating about him now is that he's pursuing this media empire of his outside the traditional channels. This is where everything is headed and it is interesting to watch a mega-personality make a go of it

totally!!

reply
what makes Carlson so threatening to his former party is not just his fixation on Trump’s unpopular war. It is that he believes Trump launched this war, in violation of his own principles and US interests, because Israel wanted him to. By explicitly tying a major US decision to pressure from Israel, Carlson has tapped into an undercurrent of antisemitism on the far right that the GOP would rather see sequestered

An "undercurrent of antisemitism"?

Or maybe we're are just tired of the forever wars on behalf of another nation that are destroying our country.

reply

Tucker is not a classical journalist ~ he is an activist-influencer.
He takes sides and positions.
He seeks to have influence and to advance the cause of his views.
Nothing wrong with that (imo) but that is not a classical journalist.
A classical journalist presents the facts and issues and leaves the consumer of the content presented to make value judgements.

reply
119 sats \ 2 replies \ @justin_shocknet 24 Oct -200 sats

Recognize an OP when you see one

https://m.stacker.news/162986

The tactic described is a managed narrative loop, a sophisticated psychological operation rooted in reflexive control and controlled opposition. In this framework, an allied commentator stages a dramatic, public shift into synthetic dissent to capture an audience of drifting skeptics and critics who are losing faith in the primary establishment narrative. By acting as a "rogue" alternative anchor, the commentator validates the audience's grievances while subtly policing the boundaries of their dissent, ensuring the energy remains defused and unorganized.
The operation concludes with narrative reconciliation, a choreographed phase where the commentator undergoes a visible change of heart—often triggered by a manufactured crisis or a perceived overreach by the actual adversary. By declaring that unity is now paramount, the agent aligns back with the main fold, effectively pulling their newly captured, trusting audience along with them. This cycle achieves fractionation, bypassing critical thinking through intense emotional oscillation to inoculate the populace against genuine grassroots rebellion.

https://m.stacker.news/162991