pull down to refresh

It is with great disappointment that I write this thread about Bitcoin Magazine.
I personally have high standards for what constitutes a "Bitcoin" conference. I do not want to pay to be bombarded by shitcoiners and their ilk. But last year, the Bitcoin 2022 conference did just that. It was heavily infiltrated by those promoting NFTs, blockchain, crypto, DeFi, shitcoins, centralized yeild farming exchanges and algorithmic stablecoins.
Many of them were even sponsors!
Bitcoin Magazine enabled these 3rd party middlemen, their shitcoins, corruption and products. In exchange they accepted their fiat sponsorship, and then turned around and invested that fiat heavily into Three Arrows Capital and GBTC.
They have lost millions of dollars on these shitcoin and paper IOU trades.
It is extremely concerning to see that now, Bitcoin Magazine is selling NFTs at auction for a minimum 10 BTC each. It's surreal to see them crossing the rubicon into shitcoin-scam city.
Are Bitcoin Magazines finances really so bad that they need to stoop so low as to sell receipts of JPEGs on a centralized standard?
It is clear that they have sold out to the highest bidder before. But this is a new low.
Before they were simply enabling the scammers and being paid for it. Last year's shilling of shitcoins on stage by Novogratz and O'Leary highlighted this. Now they are removing the middleman and going direct as NFT scam peddlers themselves!
It was never Bitcoin Magazine directly doing the scamming. They were just letting it happen. Now they really have their hands fully in the shit.
In conclusion, I urge the Bitcoin community to boycott Bitcoin Magazine until they take steps to promote the Bitcoin ethos and contain the shitcoiners. The community has the power to demand higher standards for Bitcoin conferences and publications. Let us use that power to ensure that Bitcoin Magazine does not promote distractions and subversive elements to the Bitcoin ethos.
Some things you can do is:
  • Organize your own unconference Bitcoin meetups in the area from May 18th-20th.
  • Don't attend their conference or buy their products or murch
  • Let them know your displeasure on social media.
  • Send a variation of this letter to their email contact@btcmedia.org (use chatGPT for a different version of this letter)
  • Depending on their response, further actions may be forth coming, my goal with this letter is for them to at least stop selling and promoting shitcoins themselves.
  • If you work for Bitcoin Magazine and also feel the same way as this letter, consider speaking out or getting in touch.
The below text is verbatim from their website: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/code-of-ethics
Our Code of Ethics is the code we not only work by, but live by, and expect of each other, our business partners, and suppliers. Not only do we operate according to our ethical principles and requirements, we hold ourselves and those we work with to full accountability for being in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations worldwide.
Went two years in a row and it sucked both times. Won't be going anymore. Tab conf and bitcoin++ are the only conferences I'll be going to now
reply
This is the way.
reply
Thinking of tab conf myself.
reply
PB 22 was pretty nice,
kinda meh about swan.
it was low key a good time tho.
reply
California and Swan are two things I try to avoid 🤣
reply
Ad placements on their site isn't enough, so they have to put on the parade and be understanding and dilute their reach, not making excuses for them, they just playing the growth game.
For me their push on the ordinals thing really put me off, but I guess I am not a profitable reader, thats going to convert into sales, lol so who cares? All about the short time prefference gaiiiiinz, gotta keep grifting or somone else will outgrift you
reply
Absolutely true... I was there for last year's conference.. Hated it.. Lightning focussed conferences are much better, smaller and bitcoin focussed..
reply
I have nothing against Ordinals as they abide by Bitcoin rules
I am AGAINST BTC magazine for the hype and clickbait type of shitty "news" ... its misleading for Bitcoin Newbies
Their conference is usually the same guests repeating the same old messages, NOTHING new to learn ....
reply
on the same note..... why dont you start a twitter thread and we will support you!
You guys need to quit this "shitcoin" obsession of yours and get back to reality. Like it or not, Bitcoin is part of an industry called "crypto".
Bitcoin Magazine is doing a great job at educating people. If they want to issue NFTs, good for them, and if they let prominent speakers defend Bitcoin AND other cryptos, there is nothing shocking about it.
If I needed to boycott someone or something that would be "the BTC Maxis cult" and their dangerous, stubborn, counter-productive, and rather idiotic vision of crypto.
reply
Just by putting bitcoin in the "crapto" world make you a shitcoiner. Good to know you are a shitcoiner.
Bitcoin is not part of crypto
Explain how any crypto you love is a social construct.
Bitcoin is a social construct.
It would make as much sense to group them together as it would be to call Robux or Runescape gold, Twitch bits or any other digital currency "crypto"
reply
bitcoin is a cryptocurrency
reply
Its also a digital asset, but as you can see with my Robux example, that isn't useful to describe it that way
A parrot is a bird, but I don't want to say cardinal, bluejay, woodpecker, vulture. I want to talk about a kind of bird
So you can wittle that down to songbirds corvids, or Psittaciformes
On the other hand you are a mammal which would group you in with dogs. But every time you cry and cry that you aren't like dogs I hit you with
"You are a mammal"
Bitcoin is a social construct. Things that are issued by corporate entities do not belong in the same discussion and "industry" as something that changes on the basis of social consensus.
reply
I buy that.
reply
The word “cryptocurrency” did not exist when bitcoin was invented.
reply
reply
reply
reply
reply
No.
reply
Bitcoin is part of an industry called "crypto".
Bitcoin came first. If anything it's the other way around. And that's exactly the issue.
reply
reply
reply
deleted by author
reply
Many of them were even sponsors!
Of course.
Three VCs - Sora Ventures, Tally Capital, and Fenbushi Capital - are investors in BTC Inc itself, the parent company of Bitcoin Magazine and the Bitcoin Conference.
It's VCs all the way down.
I always assume any VC funded company (rather than a grassroots community project) is never "uncompromised" as it were.
If there's a potential to make profit by shilling scams, and it's at least kinda-semi-legal, the VCs who probably have more board seats than the founders will make them do it.
reply
I mean, it's founding by the most wanted shitcoiner was probably a bad omen too.
reply
I honestly don't know much about it, but looking at the Crunchbase profile of BTC Inc and seeing it's been funded by three VCs and has acquired three other companies is all I need to assume it's just the same as any other company backed by big money - no ethics, just profit.
reply
Let’s go to swans pacific Bitcoin conference. !!much better and solid bitcoin only!get in the mission Yeah!
reply
subversive elements to the Bitcoin ethos
What is the Bitcoin ethos? Who decides what is the bitcoin ethos? If there are bitcoiners interested in Bitcoin NFTs, then why wouldn't Bitcoin Magazine talk about it or participate?
reply
You do, I do, we all do.
Welcome to the process.
Do you think it's ok to promote scams, attacks and grifting within Bitcoin?
reply
Nope. scams are bad, attacking the network is bad.
If two parties want to voluntarily trade for a thing that they want but I think is dumb, that's their business.
reply
So then we agree.
But going back to your original post on "who decides"
who decides what is and isn't an attack on the network?
My same answer applies. You do. I do. We all do.
Based on our own standards.
I'm acting accordingly and in my own best interests.
So are you, but likely because of this shitcoins incentives and your early acquisition of it. Which I believe, unfortunately, blinds you to the multiple negative implications of this disease.
reply
So any use of bitcoin that you dont like is a scam or an attack? That's a strange bar.
I think scams are fraudulent or dishonest schemes.
Just because you don't like something doesn't make it fraudulent. Moralizing blockspace is dumb. If bitcoin is money for everyone, people are going to use it for things that you don't like.
likely because of this shitcoins incentives and your early acquisition of it
Yes, I have acquired Bitcoin and I am incentivized to try to help Bitcoin succeed as Internet Money.
reply
Did you not create ordinal NFT #1 ?
Do you not mention this fact on many of the twitter spaces you attend as a way to market the eventual sale of this "receipt" ?
Are you not incentivized to shill for this shitcoin grift as a result because of the implied value you can eventually extract from this activity?
Do you not think you might just be compromised a little as a result?
In terms of your objective judgment on this development being an attack, are you not incentivized to deny any such claims? And Perhaps misconstrue, con-flate, and Lie in defense of your "asset".
reply
Before anyone cared about ordinals or inscriptions, I inscribed a DickButt because it was funny. I still think it is funny. I am not planning on selling the inscription and I am not trying to protect the market value of a dickbutt nft. I spend the bulk of my energy on things that I think are good for bitcoin, and some amount of my time on things that are fun.
reply
you're not currently planning on it, but you want the option to eventually.
You can always prove me wrong though, send your dickbutt sats to the genesis block burn address 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
shlling their magazines as 1/1 oridnals, no wonder they decided to have the ordinal art show bullshit
reply
Absolutely agree!
Honestly i think a lot of bitcoiners don’t want to pay a higher price for bitcoin only conferences because they know other conferences are cheaper. We need more posts like this to make sure everyone standing behind the bitcoin ethos, is informed why those others cons are cheaper to attend.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 28 Mar
I am just now reading this. WOW.
reply
how did you find it?
reply
youre completely right, and the worst part is that StackerNews is getting infected by nasty shitcoiners, fraudsters, and scammers, as we can clearly see them in this comment section. I didnt expect this comment section to be so polluted by scammers
reply
to be honest, that's nothing new. stacker news has a fairly light moderation policy and there is a good contingent of the shitcoiners variety here.
I was more surprised by the amount of positive support for this thread.
reply
They invited Pomp as a speaker, hard to take conference seriously after that.
reply
Go to Lugano Plan instead, much better conference. https://planb.lugano.ch/planb-forum/
reply
I do appreciate the free sats they give me for pretending to read their articles. Ok, I actually read one once and awhile. But yeah they have a long history of dancing with the shitcoin devils.
reply
Truly their new low.
reply
always been resilient against the bitcoin conf fomo hysteria. nothing about it is attractive to me personally
reply
their website is not usable over tor
reply
Update: I recently rechecked, and their website is now accessible over Tor. Thank you to whoever fixed this!
reply
2022 was very shitcoiny, like sickening.
let's see if they turn around for 2023 before throwing hate.
We will know soon enough.
reply
selling NFTs at auction for a minimum 10 BTC each
It's a dutch auction. Maximum of 10 BTC each
reply
It's really hard to make proper nice conferences about open source, since there's no money in it.
reply
Or just watch the Open Source stage online, and send whatever sats you would have spent on tickets/ travel to the devs of the projects that most impress you.
reply
Imo there are better battles to choose
reply
you're not wrong.
This is one I'm willing to go for.
reply
I believe in the free market. Taking money from shitcoiners to enable good educational efforts like "21 days" and paying newbies sats to help onboarding isn't such a bad tradeoff. Sometimes you need to make a deal with the devil. By the same token, you have every right to organize a boycott.
reply
legitimizing scams and running scams is not the way. Furthermore, some of these scams may be attacks on Bitcoin proper.
There is no excuse for participating as a witless fool, or greedy grifter in this activity.
Appeals to the greater good lead to hell.
reply
FYI, here is a link to the 2023 sponsors
reply
Yep. fully aware that their strategy seems to be to grift form the grifters.
zero respect for it.
reply
Feriez vous autrement..a leur place .. S'il ne trouve que des sponsors de ses domaines ... Je pense que c'est plutôt au bitcoin lover de ce manifesté en sponsorinsant l'événement