463 sats \ 15 replies \ @iguano 8 May 2023 \ on: Network congestion will turn out to be good for bitcoin adoption bitcoin
adoption of what?
a guy on Africa who pays 10$ for a transaction is not going to adopt bitcoin.
An idiot who buys a jpeg for 10$ yes.
the question is, what we want?
Adoption of the lightning network. I would like to take this time to remind everyone of all the mocking of the lightning network as having fees that are too high. No, rather on-chain to LN swap because on-chain is too cheap to bother with a proper lightning wallet.
On the other hand, fuck custodians. If using a custodian were an acceptable solution, we'd be using something inconvenient like gold or something. There are many improvements to the lightning network coming down the pipe that will make using a custodian sound silly.
reply
everyone knows here that the LN is the solution.
And of course is better to use a custodial wallet for a beginner who manage small amounts that paying 10$ fee.
In fact I guess having high fees is good to try to kill this nonsense.
reply
let them start to use LN first, then we will educate them ("not your keys, not your Bitcoin")
not the opposite
reply
they can use LN but they can have their keys too.
in any case, education is good no matter how you use bitcoin.
reply
Non-custodial LN might not be enough, many people will be disincentivized to open their own channel with such high fees
reply
There are many improvements to the lightning network coming down the pipe that will make using a custodian sound silly.
reply
For me, getting away from custodians is the selling point that gets people on Bitcoin in the first place so that flow makes no sense.
reply
how you imagine your success rate with newbies proposing them right now $10-20 fee for non-custodial LN wallet, when e.g. starting with WalletOfSatoshi is free of charge - and for them the functionally is simply the same
option 1:
"start with free of charge LN wallet, and migrate to non-custodial version when on-chain fees are back to acceptable"
option 2:
force them to $10-20 starting fee just to keep away from custodians (but don't cry there is no LN adoption)
reply
option 3: I pay the $20 channel opening fee. The channel goes to my node. User doesn't gotta worry about a thing.
reply
If I would start now taking payments, I think is better to start accepting LN in a custodial wallet and after I put together 200 or 300$, I would send that to my hodl wallet (non custodial on chain) or I would open my first channel on a easy wallet like phoenix or breez.
reply
"Most of newcomers will use: custodial LN wallets." (like it or not: #174247)
reply
most newcomers already use custodial wallets no matter which coin they use.
reply
so, the more important is that Lightning Network "gates" are broadly open
like Binance LN support hopefully, and the snowball effect may appear, regardless of on-chain fees
and newcomers will learn very quickly, when is the proper moment to move sats into on-chain wallet if necessary...
reply
the snowball effect already started.
binance is adopting lightning because is being used. not the opposite.
reply
...because Binance is cancer for Bitcoin :)
Bitfinex LN support, for example: September 2020
reply