All these protocols are layer 2 solutions and Bitcoin blockchain is just a storage layer for them, so I guess that all of them (and maybe something else) will be present in some proportion.
One has a tract record of shipping code that manages hundreds of millions of dollars, collaborating with protocol developers, and focusing on providing application devs the support they need for over half a decade.
The question I'd ask is how many stablecoins do we need, why is it more than 1 and if it's 1, then why do we need whole framework, protocol and node impl for this?
All these protocols are layer 2 solutions and Bitcoin blockchain is just a storage layer for them, so I guess that all of them (and maybe something else) will be present in some proportion.
One has a tract record of shipping code that manages hundreds of millions of dollars, collaborating with protocol developers, and focusing on providing application devs the support they need for over half a decade.
My bet is on them.
and Bisq are working on RGB integration yesterday! https://twitter.com/bisq_network/status/1658381775863685121 This is the news!
Open source and decentralisation obviously win. RGB can't be sued!
I prefer Taro
Sadly looks like inscriptions will win by a large margin
Sad but true - most simple and understandable solutions win
I'm out here rooting for taro
Well, it is a root!
The question I'd ask is how many stablecoins do we need, why is it more than 1 and if it's 1, then why do we need whole framework, protocol and node impl for this?
I thought RGB was more generalized than Taro (btw I don't think they're named this anymore)
Both.
In the end of day market will decide what's "better" protocol.
going to wait for this to blow over
Both!
Yes good post 👍
https://m.stacker.news/18839
deleted by author
Merkle sum sparse merkle trees lol
Merkle sum sparse merkle trees lol
There is RGB documentation out there:
https://rgb.tech/
https://www.rgbfaq.com/
https://blackpaper.rgb.tech/
deleted by author
Merkle sum sparse merkle trees lol