pull down to refresh
related posts
636 sats \ 3 replies \ @nerd2ninja 20 May 2023
Why is this disgusting?
reply
65 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 20 May 2023
Yes, why is this disgusting? A man starts a company solving real world problems and his own nation's government creates an environment making it more and more difficult for people to voluntarily use this service. How is what he is doing disgusting? What the state is doing is disgusting. Their monopoly on money. Their monopoly on violence which they use to enslave the people of the world. That is disgusting.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @tlkipps OP 20 May 2023
Exactly..👍🏻
reply
51 sats \ 0 replies \ @GhostofTruth 20 May 2023
You're asking the only right question here! Thanks. Free capital movement is the limiting leverage we have to bring state actors in control.
reply
53 sats \ 8 replies \ @tlkipps OP 20 May 2023
Jack is doing what he needs to do… I get it I ‘m speaking to the US regulators who are driving innovation out of the US and not embracing the technology….
reply
51 sats \ 7 replies \ @03365d6a53 20 May 2023
why would anyone want to build a company in a hostile (and downright dangerous) jurisdiction?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @tlkipps OP 20 May 2023
That would definitely be a question I would like answered, I understand that El Salvador is Bitcoin friendly … but what about other risks.. it will take more research to understand it all….
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @guts 20 May 2023
What other risks?, since the rid of maras there as been almost cero homicides in El Salvador.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @l0k18 20 May 2023
volcano sploding!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @tlkipps OP 20 May 2023
I would need to look at it as I was going to move there… maybe all the risks would be positive.. not all risks are negative..right…
I might be worth looking into…👍🏻
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @02d769cb73 20 May 2023
are u talking about ElSa or the US ?
reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @03365d6a53 20 May 2023
US, obviously
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @tlkipps OP 20 May 2023
The US and the SEC
reply