Great post.
I'm always unsure which lightning wallet to recommend.
A new user should not be expected to open a channel
And whilst muun is great for small amounts, they screw you over once you start using it for regular amounts
These days I recommend custodial (non KYC) wallets, specifically Blink. However, they require a phone number.
If anyone can recommend a non kyc, custodial, no phone number required lightning wallet (without a hard GSF dependency) would love to hear about it!
Breez is non-custodial, non-KYC and doesn't require opening channels (at least not as far as the user is aware).
reply
Just tried it - would be more reassuring if it wasn't in Beta, although the 'you may lose all your funds' warning should probably be standard for anyone not running their own stack!
reply
Yeah, opening the initial channel is a major problem. Wallets like Breez helping users with this will definitely help to make it easy.
Being non-custodial, non-kyc and open source - what's not to love?
I'm sure when they're out of beta they'll get the users.
Nice!
reply
Phoenix wallet IMO is good one, user friendly and not technically challenging for the user.
reply
Doesn't WoS meet the requirements?
reply
I don't see where to install it from - where is the repository?
Looks like this is available for Google (or Apple) subscribers only...
reply
thanks @ekyzyis / @m00ninite - I will try out both your suggestions
reply
Looks like @Siggy47 (below) has come up with a great suggestion. I'd seen the word Ark thrown about in posts in the last few days - but with limited time didn't read them.
On first look it seems like a possible solution to the 'Little Old Lady' question.
Yay!
PS here's the podcast episode that Siggy mentions:
reply
deleted by author
reply
I do like Blink despite their SMS requirement
reply
deleted by author
reply
Yeah. I get their position, it's a lot of risk to take.
Things I like about Blink are:
  • Super low fees
  • Very fast
  • Easy to on-board
  • Company very hands on with building Bitcoin communities
  • Bitcoin only
  • App does not depend on GSF
reply
deleted by author
reply