I have some questions for you, because I was thinking to use walletano for this use case:
  1. Are there any withdraw limits / day if the user will choose the custodial account?
  2. Are you planning to integrate some swap services too? Like user receive payments during the day over LN and end of day or x days, he withdraw to an onchain address that controls using an integrated swap (something like coinos.io have). Could be also good for walletano to charge fees for this service.
  3. Right now, do you have enough good liquidity on your node to handle many custodial accounts to be used in a production env.?
  4. do you think in the future Walletano will be forced to KYC its users?
reply
Hi.
  1. Currently there are no limits, but most of our users use the wallet for small amounts. 2, At this moment: no. We will probably integrate onchain deposits and withdrawals that will have their own fee structure.
  2. At this moment, liquidity is not an issue. Most of our invoices and payments are confirmed quite fast, but of course, fast comes with some higher fees,
  3. Considering the latest events everything is possible, But we are not yet there, let's see what the future brings to us.
reply
Thank you, that clears up.
reply
Now if I could only charge sats for incoming email...
reply
I'm pretty sure Saylor is working on this. Dude shits on spam emails like there's no tomorrow.
reply
It's not a new idea. Hashcash was proposed back in the 90s to require proof of work to prevent email spam. Sending sats is even better because I'm essentially paid for my attention.
reply
Not even a bad idea! Just need to think about how to do it!
reply
thanks, this looks like a great service!
reply