deleted by author
I don't think this describes the ethos of bitcoiners at all. Maybe get a broader selection of evidence beyond a couple people who want to act tough or like jackasses.
reply
I'm not saying they're many, I'm saying they are more than in the population in general.
reply
Not sure about that.
reply
OK, there's of course distribution depending on what we've been happening to read/listen to. Good that it doesn't seem like it from your perspective!
Thanks for the input.
reply
Been around this space a long time and never encountered what you speak of. Perhaps you’ve gone down the wrong rabbit hole.
reply
There are lunatics anywhere in the world. No corralation to a freedom asset like btc. You might need to get a wider perspective of the social community of bitcoiners and its behavioural characteristics.
reply
@final had an insightful thing to say here in the comment field:
You'll often find that evil people will choose to place themselves into not-mainstream topics to influence their growth, knowing that people into those topics will be forced to integrate with them because of how small the interest base is. This muds the water and makes others think that it has a higher proportion of bad people.
Otherwise, I listen to maybe 10-15 different BTC podcasts, and read Stacker News and links, and am on Nostr.
And no, it's nowhere near a majority that seems abusive, but it seems higher than people in general.
reply
I've personally never come across this anywhere. It's also something I dont think Bitcoiners would approve of if people saw this more. The only thing I can say about Bitcoiners is that I think more of them can have more radical (but not harmful) opinions compared to the average person.
You'll often find that evil people will choose to place themselves into not-mainstream topics to influence their growth, knowing that people into those topics will be forced to integrate with them because of how small the interest base is. This muds the water and makes others think that it has a higher proportion of bad people.
This is far from a bitcoin thing, but some people will choose Bitcoin as their platform of choice because it's easy to grift and fool the uneducated. Once bitcoiners find their problems, oftentimes they immediately move to something else to grift onto.
Personally I think a lot of podcast shows that aren't technical or hosted by professionals often are just incessant, hateful garbage. You can look at podcasts from other communities that always have similar problems.
reply
You'll often find that evil people will choose to place themselves into not-mainstream topics to influence their growth, knowing that people into those topics will be forced to integrate with them because of how small the interest base is. This muds the water and makes others think that it has a higher proportion of bad people.
That's insightful! Thanks!
reply
Which podcasts? Episodes and timestamps would also be appreciated.
reply
I don't remember where in What Bitcoin Did, but Coin Stories was this one: https://www.podbean.com/site/EpisodeDownload/DIR192A77ADK4AMW
at about 38 minutes.
reply
Thanks man.
I can't say I've seen too much of this in the Bitcoin community myself. If anything there's a libertarian streak which plants itself firmly against violence / coercion, including the military industrial complex that the guest in question was a part of.
I don't think it's a common theme, but of course with a net as large as Bitcoin you're always gonna bag yourself a few crazies.
reply
The ones in the examples? What Bitcoin Did and Coin Stories.
reply
Your examples are extremely flimsy. The salary one sounds like some harmless fun, hardly child abuse. The coin stories one was an old guy talking about a draft dodger during Vietnam, so military aged "child" in this case. The real question is why are you doing this? What's your motivation for falsely painting Bitcoiners as child abusers?
reply
1: you have a weird definition of "harmless fun" if it involves the loss of a months salary. Particularly someone's first. No, maybe not abuse, but deception/fraud. 2: Sure, maybe not child abuse, but definitely abuse. 3: As I mentioned in another comment, these are not all examples, just the recent ones I remembered where I heard. And 4: Because I want the community to reflect on how a small part of it treats their children, to be better in the future. If my motivation had been to paint the community in a bad light, I wouldn't have published it on a Bitcoin site. 5: I have deleted the post, since just one commenter took it seriously and the rest are either not seeing anything or are attacking me for pointing it out.
reply
Your post made it sound like this is a widespread problem with bitcoiners. Literally no one in the community is glorifying or advocating for child abuse. Good call on deleting.
reply
That was not the intention with it, as I said elsewhere, it is not common, but seems more common than with people in general. "Literally no one" is pure bullshit, and you know that very well. It would not surprise me if it's some kind of projection from your side. You saying that it was a good call on deleting makes me think it wasn't...
reply
Funny how you make the same assumption about me as you made about all bitcoiners. And based on the amount of evidence (zero). How did you end up becoming such a judgmental prick?
reply
There are lunatics anywhere in the world. No corralation to a freedom asset like btc. You might need to get a wider perspective of the social community of bitcoiners and its behavioural characteristics.
reply
where's the downvote button?
reply
deleted by author
reply
So....one anecdote?
reply
I counted three that I mentioned in the text, plus a few others that I don't remember where I read/heard, and hence didn't include. I've only been listening/reading for a few months though.
reply
I counted one and one "maybe". Tricking kid from salary isnt abuse per se
reply
Not abuse per se perhaps, but a form of deception/fraud. I doubt a libertarian, or pretty much anyone for that matter, would agree with it happening between two random people, so why would it be okay with his son? The other one is a twofer, the guest and the host agreeing.
reply
Call out the individuals with sources
reply
Copy of reply to @orthwyrm: I don't remember where in What Bitcoin Did, but Coin Stories was this one: https://www.podbean.com/site/EpisodeDownload/DIR192A77ADK4AMW
at about 38 minutes.
reply
Seem like he is condoning the patriotism primarily, not abuse...
reply
Not like he could do one without the other the way he said it though. Personally I'm not a fan of either, but the abuse is of course the worse.
Sounds like you should listen to a different podcast lol.
The child abusing podcaster seems to be selecting people that justify their moral world views.
reply
It was different podcasts.
reply
I don't accept the premise of this post.
reply
reply
Your premise is that there "seem like there is an unproportionally large amount of child abusers among Bitcoiners." I don't agree.
reply
OK, thanks. See response so @grayruby, maybe I've just had bad luck with the podcasts I've found so far.
reply