I guess I'm off-base judging by the other comments here, but this doesn't bother me. I'm okay with allowing the market to decide if that sat has more value than another. Or, no, it does not. They're not wrong that some sats can be proven to be "different." If Alice feels a Hal Finney sat is worth 10,000 sats and is willing to pay those 10K, why not? Free market. Freedom.
reply
I agree with you - let the market decide. That being said, this move by BM makes me less likely to take what they say seriously, and it also makes me less likely to recommend the brand to others.
reply
Company reviews are part of the free market. Are restaurant reviews against "free market" or part of it?
reply
I'd say definitely part of the free market, as well as me returning to a nice place or no longer going to that cruddy restaurant.
reply
well said
reply
And let the free markets say "fuck these scam artists"
Your point?
reply
Had time to write some further explanation. Here it is, since you asked: https://hive.blog/category/@crrdlx/allow-the-free-market-to-do-what-it-does
reply
Yes, that kind of is my point. If the market dislikes it, then it will be rejected. So, yes.
reply
"Buy and Sell Rare Bitcoin"
This is outright fraud.
Fuck Bitcoin Magazine. Seriously.
reply
Damn. I still liked Bitcoin Magazine but this is a step too far.
reply
Shitcoin Magazine
reply
I hate how people think this is art.....
reply
The shitcoinery within that company needs to be rooted out before it completely ruins the brand. Name and shame.
reply
deleted by author
reply
reply
What is it with “bitcoin” brands doing everything they can to tarnish the value in the name they have
Bitcoin Magazine
Bitcoin.com
Why???
reply