59 sats \ 11 replies \ @birdeye21 OP 15 Aug 2023 \ parent \ on: Stuff that's cringe in Bitcoin: bitcoin
cringe:
hating on things that you yourself use a lot
@nullcount continuing to tie sats earned to their $USD value. I think I speak for almost everyone here when I say I’m approximately 10x more stingy with 300 sats from my hot wallet than I am with $3 from my leather wallet, explain that to me
reply
If you value your sats today higher than the exchange rate, you are irrational unless trading at the exchange rate would realize a loss for you.
Its also possible that selling BTC "in a KYC way" could pose extra risks to privacy that effectively create a marginal loss depending how you value that risk.
Likewise, selling in a no-KYC way adds inconvenience which has costs as well.
reply
I definitely don’t consider myself completely rational, if I were then I’d only invest in US Treasuries (ie “risk free” assets)
reply
Clearly you would, as demonstrated by your Strawman.
Having an investment thesis in BTC is not irrational. But it is delusional to value present day sats "10x higher" than present value.
People who say this aren't serious unless they've sold all their possessions at 90% discount to acquire sats.
reply
You forgot to account for the time and complication in getting the sats back vs getting the $3 back. $3 ends up in your pocket by itself annoyingly, where you have to do a thing to get the sats in the wallet. In USA doing "a thing" costs more than $3 in fiat. In bitcoin the value of the time is higher. Also the risk in fiat is high, so I think It's rational and to value bitcoin above market offers for small amounts.
reply
Good points
reply
Are you saying that small amounts of BTC should be valued above the exchange rate because transaction fees are a "thing"?
reply
lol, na, that sounds silly, I'm ignoring btc transaction fees, just reffering to human ones.
reply
No, that's called being critical, not cringe. If nobody had critiques, there would be no improving.
I wish more bitcoiners to criticize bitcoin from a bitcoiner's perspective. Too many critiques are dismissed because they come from "outsiders". But many of their complaints have a nugget of truth to them.
reply
Publishing an hour long podcast about how someone earned $150 in sats over 2 years of work writing articles. And pretending its revolutionary.
Your perspective is all off. The sats aren't where the value of SN is.
Pretending btc is inevitable or already won the global reserve currency status
That's your echo chamber speaking. "Bitcoiners" don't necessarily all agree on this.
Refusing to acknowledge how BTC has been supplanted as free market money for Darknet Markets. But still call BTC freedom money even tho people use privacy coins when freedom is actually at stake.
First sentence is simply false and cannot be proved. Second sentence is HTP thinking.
Overall, anytime bitcoiners act delusional or LARP.
Look in the mirror
reply
IDK how you can believe it is false that BTC is supplanted in darknets. Everywhere that accepts BTC, puts a tax on it so the admins can pay for the CoinJoins to required to clean it. That puts it a second-rate currency in my book. IF they accept BTC at face-value or at a discount, its because freedom isn't actually at stake.
Saying something is HTP thinking when, in fact, its the way things are right now, is cringe.
reply