I mostly post links and don't reply to most unproductive comments.
There are a few users that comment on stuff while obviously not having watched/listened/read what I posted. Bonus points for just saying they don't like it or don't have a productive solution or original thought for presented problem/topic.
Yeah, but if someone asks a question, do you ignore it?
reply
Abd what is wrong wiyh answering with a link that explain it in more details and also could be bookmarked for later? Do you really think you will learn more about bitcoin by saving random posts from reddit or SN? No. You save documentation. This is how I learned: I read documentatik and save it fir kater too.
reply
I don't think there's anything wrong with using a link as a response to a question. I think there's something wrong with creating a new post that is a link, and then ignoring that post there after.
reply
@darthcoin responding to questions with links is definitely appropriate and is always extremely helpful in my experience. When people initiate a brand new post with nothing but a link, and the article is highly technical / looks like a Greek textbook to me - that’s normally when I ignore the post and leave them Zapless
reply
I don't understand your point.
reply
Obviously. This has been the problem since your first comment. My post used you as an example of reasonable and productive behavior. Not as an example of unreasonable and unproductive behavior. As for your comments...
reply
Most of SN users think that I am here to "earn sats" posting on SN. They are all wrong. I am here to help them, even if that in the beginning they will not get my "attitude". Later they will remember my words. Always.
reply
Other than your defaulting to impatience and aggressive language, I think you provide great service.
reply
Genuine question yes, obvious bait question no
reply
95% of my questions are genuine, and the rest are totally snarky.
reply