pull down to refresh
13 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 29 Aug 2023
Nitter links:
https://nitter.net/BitcoinMagazine/status/1696530560154546220
https://nitter.it/BitcoinMagazine/status/1696530560154546220
https://nitter.cz/BitcoinMagazine/status/1696530560154546220
Nitter is a free and open source alternative Twitter front-end focused on privacy and performance. Click here for more information.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sudonaka 30 Aug 2023
The appeal was granted to continue the hearing...? Doesn't the SEC still decide?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @brianh 29 Aug 2023
Say it with me: Gary is a clown.
reply
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @faithandcredit OP 29 Aug 2023
Disclaimer: There is no source in the tweet
reply
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @kepford 29 Aug 2023
Super annoying when they do that.
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 29 Aug 2023
Don't they always do that?
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @kepford 29 Aug 2023
Bitcoin Mag? Yeah, pretty much. I really dislike it.
reply
10 sats \ 5 replies \ @shyfire 29 Aug 2023
Yeah I unfollowed them for this reason. It's super dumb.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @1c8c319862 30 Aug 2023
fuck the sec, grayscale, and shitcoin-mag with their silly ordinals lol
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 29 Aug 2023
I mean it makes sense ... they want to break news on twitter to gain twitter followers but they don't want to share sources or other publications because they only want to promote their own publication.
reply
1435 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 29 Aug 2023
Its a very short term thinking approach. It is the same approach old school newspaper sites have done for years. The never have outbound links. I get it, I just think its bad form and makes me distrust them. Open wins long term.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @shyfire 29 Aug 2023
Thinking those two objectives (gain followers and include references) are orthogonal seems to me like legacy media style thinking
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 29 Aug 2023
I agree. Non-legacy style thinking is risky though so we shouldn't be surprised.
It's the hypocrisy that blows my mind personally. You see all this "decentralized, foss, and free for thee" but "hierarchical, closed, and pay-for-play for me" in bitcoin media.
reply on another page