pull down to refresh
140 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 4 Sep 2023 \ on: Evidence backing the "Big Blockers are behind Paul Sztorc's Drivechains" theory bitcoin
That's not evidence that "big blockers are behind Paul Sztorc's Drivechains theory". That's just a hint and a tweet out of context that mentions his position regarding selling BCH for BTC afaict.
You have a link for that tweet?
Look, he's not going to admit that Roger Ver and them are behind his company and the Drivechains nonsense.
However, there's this video --> #241855
And this tweet --> https://twitter.com/Truthcoin/status/891803506134458368
So far.
reply
I didn't say he's not backed.
I'm just trying to hold up standards in this discussion.
Using a simple screenshot of a tweet without even a link as "evidence" is ridiculous from any side of any discussion
reply
I know it wasn't clear at first that this was the second post in a series. My mistake.
You did hold the standard, and I already gave you the link to the tweet and the video. Those are pieces of evidence.
I know I haven't proved anything yet and none of us were in those backdoor meetings to verify, but the situation does look suspicious. Hopefully, more will be revealed.
reply