related posts
1501 sats \ 0 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 5 Sep 2023
I applaud the designs, but this seems a bit outrageous to me. Seems like their target audience is HNWI's that think spending more money == good.
Multisig device that is $1000 with a multisig software solution that costs $200 a month. Targetting the Apple ecosystem solely.
Screenless hardware device so has a lot of the security trade off's that Square's affordable devices have (I think they are targetting $35 or less). I don't even see how you would interact with it. No screen, no battery, NFC, and they say no fear of loss or theft? Seems to be leveraging Apple's multi device ecosystem a lot, which is kind of cool. But then what's the point of the hardware device? Just a $1000 fashion device?
Some interesting ideas here but pointless expensive hardware device and in general this is probably just a marketing page to raise money to build the magic they're selling.
reply
1870 sats \ 0 replies \ @nuII 5 Sep 2023
do they make one with a flared base?
reply
799 sats \ 1 reply \ @03365d6a53 5 Sep 2023
From their privacy policy:
To be fair, if you're an Apple user (and this opaque, closed source product is Apple only), you probably don't care about Privacy :-)
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @mallardshead 5 Sep 2023
The issue with all the 2/3+ hybrid multisig companies is that they have the xpubs, and have to, otherwise recovery is impossible unless you lost a key but not that key's xpub. This solution is just more bespoke. Admittedly cool. You have to accept the trade-offs. For some people's situation (business, family, living arrangement) it makes quite a bit of sense, just not for mine or DIYers.
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @phygit 5 Sep 2023
Minimalist.
Nice.
Expensive.
Excessive.
reply
6 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 5 Sep 2023
Looks easy to smuggle. 🕳️
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @crrdlx 5 Sep 2023
Cool looking and clever, but seems like a giant T-shirt that reads: "I have money, rob me now."
reply