0 sats \ 7 replies \ @jk_14 6 Sep 2023 \ parent \ on: Tail Emissions Are A Terrible Idea bitcoin
so, the solution is:
let's overtax active users by taxation in case of being active participant
and let passive parasites will be free of taxation
cool AF, and honest :)
There's no "overtax", you pay for the service. Need your tx to get into a block? Pay for it. Don't need it? Don't pay. It's that simple.
reply
as a passive stakeholder you also pay for the service, then
and the service name is:
providing robust security to the Bitcoin network
Don't need it, my passive parasite in post-subsidy era?
So, you will pay it anyway, in decreasing price of Bitcoin, clear as crystal... :)
reply
I will pay it anyway because I'd need to use bitcoin to pay for goods and services. But I will do it voluntarily and in a way that I prefer. The difference is consent and actual need. If I only need one tx in a month I will pay once a month, if someone needs it more often they will pay accordingly. Rather worry about the insufficient block space to accommodate all of humanity, I'm sure you'll be arguing for increasing the block size next.
reply
I'm sure you'll be arguing for increasing the block size next.
I dumped all my brand new b-cash almost instantly and in a hurry.
that's just your prediction "quality" in its finest, lol
reply
What stops you from returning to it? Prediction is about the future, not the past that already happened. I'm not sure you understand what "prediction" is, probably mistaking it for "postdiction" or something.
reply
I'm sure you'll be
LOL
reply
Yes, future tense, not past.
reply