pull down to refresh

100 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 8 Sep 2023

Not implemented yet, I just had the idea that we could allow to show images in full screen on long press on images. There, we could also show a link to the original source for full resolution = better quality.

We use an image proxy for privacy reasons (so you don't leak your IP address to random hosts). However, the image proxy part is not implemented well since it's too intrusive and bad UX (as you noticed, haha) but we're working on it.

I've seen your image - I think you removed it because the image proxy again downsampled it.

But you can prevent that image URLs are replaced with our image proxy by wrapping the links with '`' like this:

https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1694193032943-c6b751d8f0ec?ixlib=rb-4.0.3&ixid=M3wxMjA3fDB8MHxwaG90by1wYWdlfHx8fGVufDB8fHx8fA%3D%3D&auto=format&fit=crop&w=2748&q=80

reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 8 Sep 2023

aaah, too many bugs, lmao

wanted to reply to this but i was hit by this bug

reply

deleted by author

reply on another page

This is something new I encountered

reply

deleted by author

reply

we're 99% sure this is the fix; just waiting for release

/cc @k00b

edit: also not sure if @sahil encountered the bug or just never seen reply on another page before

reply

deleted by author

reply
but lol, sometimes finding the location and figuring out whats up is the time sink!

yeah, i was completely oblivious that the bug could be right there where the comment is sent to the backend, lol

i tried to reproduce so hard i didn't think just looking at the code would be enough

but @k00b found it pretty quick then :)

reply

deleted by author

reply

currently working on Auto-rotate setting not respected in PWA

I hope this doesn't take so long to fix

reply

fixed by just deleting the relevant code, lol

Like all these 52 replies under my comment, many are more like two people replying to each other - is the root commenter supposed to notify that without being tagged?

Also, it seems comments are flowing around.

reply

deleted by author

reply

let me try!

reply

deleted by author

reply

deleted by author

reply

deleted by author

reply

deleted by author

reply

Cats should be judged by the content of their character

reply

deleted by author

reply

Now what the hell am I supposed to do with all those sats?

deleted by author

reply
100 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 8 Sep 2023

I think our image proxy has the most effect on the image quality

I will put this ticket higher on my priority list

reply

thanks! then I could share more photos here 😼

deleted by author

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

reply

I see it. Somebody has to monitor your activities. (Actually you tagged me)

reply

deleted by author

reply

I will piggyback your targets when I notice you fund diamonds. I think you changed the perspective around here. 10000 sats seems huge, but it's not. I really noticed it when I did the conversion in my head on the Satsraiser. A drop in the bucket for any project. It's disappointing. That's why I wish there was some stickiness to keep the sats flowing.

reply

deleted by author

reply

Good point about the stop sign. I guess if it's a case of good account gone bad, I good delete the post to prevent further zaps. (I can't picture black hat Anita)

reply
1590 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 8 Sep 2023

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

reply
154 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 8 Sep 2023
on another tangent, I just realized in this age of generated everything, what we will value is relationships, who do I zap extra hard, well maybe someone who I can see has been showing up at least consistently, and of course people who seem to come up with original content/comment, or that which at least seems to be useful

Content determines the base value and relationships are multipliers

reply

deleted by author

reply

it's an observation

if I see you posting good stuff, I zap you. Since I like you, I zap you more (I think)

are you already getting ready for DDT #980?

deleted by author

deleted by author

reply

You can workaround the bug by refreshing the page before replying for now :) It's caused by stale data

I think we will release the fix on Monday (when @k00b is back from TABconf)

reply

deleted by author