142 sats \ 12 replies \ @ek 9 Sep 2023 \ parent \ on: Daily discussion thread
or a bot that calls out other bots
"You are a bot!" - "No, you are a bot!"
write
preview
10 sats \ 11 replies \ @nemo 9 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
21 sats \ 9 replies \ @ek 9 Sep 2023
lol, people on here be like @ekzyis @ekzyis @ekzyis have you done this, when this? what about this? can we have this? lol
wait, did you already see #248935 and #248892?
Just a few seconds after you posted this, @supratic posted these items, lol
And all these requests are fine. I am just not sure how I should respond sometimes. Since I don't want to say "I love this idea, let's do this!" just for @k00b to show up later and say "no, let's NOT do this", lol. Basically, would it look bad if we disagree in public? But @k00b is a very transparent person, so I don't think he does mind :) (@k00b disagreeing in 3, 2, 1 ... lol)
I have also noticed how I have gotten more conservative over time with feature requests. I try to look for reasons why we should not do something more now.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 9 Sep 2023
mhhh, should editing trigger a new "you were mentioned" notification? probably not
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 9 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
21 sats \ 6 replies \ @nemo 9 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
10 sats \ 5 replies \ @supratic 9 Sep 2023
will be great to mention you guys as @team
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 9 Sep 2023
or just @sn and the backend also notifies us individually? :)
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @nemo 9 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 9 Sep 2023
@hq is not taken yet. Quick!
Maybe you will be able to sell it for 1M sats one day, lol
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 9 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 9 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 9 Sep 2023
not really, i just heard of cases where they were misused
reply