AMAZING POST! Natalia you should get all the credit /zaps from this. Just for taking the time to write all this you deserve a lot of sats. I will send you some anyways for this work.
@k00b please add this to the "guide" page, will be good for new users to read.
guys, please don't zap this comment! All sats are going to Natalia and then fw to me, is like a continuous loop FFS! This is pure madness!
reply
deleted by author
reply
wow, so when you zap someone in the comment section, the ones being fw would have the cuts too? that is so cool, so does it mean everything in the post is shared?
I do not quite understand - isn't it normally when you zap someone, all the zap goes to that person? how does the cut work? eg If you are zapping 210 sats to @hq in the comment section, what would happen?
reply
pure madness
reply
it's called a paid experiment, maybe some new findings will end up in one of my future articles 🤣
reply
deleted by author
reply
@k00b please add this to the "guide" page, will be good for new users to read.
My personal opinion on this is that I would like to avoid any official endorsement of anything even if it's great content. We should just make great content better discoverable.
I think it's part of the "SN spirit" that we're all equal and the community decides what is great :)
But yes, making old but great content better discoverable has been a long issue. @Natalie also mentions this:
Also, one more personal observation: most links' lifespan is generally 24 hours here.
imo, not only links but everything
reply
so nice that this post is still hanging on the front page after two days 👀⚡️
reply
And you will be featured in SNL !
reply
reply
And it's still getting zapped
Maybe that's why
I really need to make a SN blog post about how the trust algorithm works
Will also be good for me to understand it properly with concrete data
reply
me too; it is so interesting, and quite a nice experiment - you can actually still get zaps and be on the front page after 24 hours!
reply
deleted by author
reply
but no cuts for you 😏 mine is more fun, right.!
reply
@nemo you realize that zapping natalia is like zapping yourself on this thread? Is pure madness this thread. And I got also sats LOL Please stop 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
we are creating a butterfly effect damn it!
@k00b - suggestion for the name of the next SNL: butterfly effect
reply
we are creating a fake GDP; I saw a fun meme earlier, it is saying the same thing in the fiat world 🤣
Is pure madness
replace "sparta" with "stacker news"
edit: this might be a good opportunity to learn how to edit gifs
deleted by author
reply
why did you do that, to increase GDP? 😂
okay, all fun anyways 😂😂😂 we are here for fun.
they see @nemo, they zap
reply
deleted by author
reply
Is supposed to be a secret
reply
Nah, people don't get it and then blame it
It should be transparent, unlike algorithms from other companies
reply
shitcoiners will start assmilking...
reply
That's not how this works
The security of our algorithm does not depend on it being a secret
reply
aaah, my time to edit ran out and I wasn't able to fix mistyping @Natalia's nym, lol
reply
almost like hinting to me I should squat the ID @natalie , what if people would fw sats there 🤣
reply
deleted by author
reply
Yeah we suck at surfacing the archive.
reply
Imaging when great content is easy to be rediscovered, this would encourage more people to create evergreens.! because bad content is short-lived = no ongoing sats 😂😂
reply