I think if I understand you correctly you don’t want any “organization” anything collectively to manage any sats.

You only want a souvereign individual to manage their sats.

So if sonebody has a team of 2 that manages a lightning node with sats, you are against it. Fundamentally. Because only sovereign individuals should be able to manage it.

So basically you cannot have a business of more than 1 people managing bitcoin.

A school managing bitcoin is also making it shitcoin.

Because a school is not a sovereign individual.

I see your point. But I don’t agree.

For instance I think Michael Saylor with his company MicroStrategy is not a sovereign individual, there are more people involved. And it gas nothing to do with shitcoinization.

Let me ask you differently @DarthCoin: how would you “organize” 10 billion sats for the vulnerable people in the world? The ones tgat need education, a roof, anything? How would you “organize” those sovereign individuals that are spread around the world to do something collectively good?

You are standing there on the mountain with your lightning sword.

How would a wise man like you solve this puzzle? No shitcoins, no foundation. But how?

Peer to peer?

I have seen many people here on Stacker.news. And there is an Austrian lady doing great in Africa with bitcoin, WITH her foundation. And she is not shitcoinizing any bitcoin.

@Darthcoin thanks. The foundation is not for Bitcoin. The foundation is to do good with bitcoin.

I’m not talking about any shitcoins here. I’m talking about organizing funding to do good.