I see and yeah I agree. The amount of satoshis people zap isn't necessarily what should be incentivized, but the frequency at which people zap I think is important! Zapping often indicates active zappers -- let's get that number as high as we can! But yes, the tricky part is incentivizing generosity while also weeding out the bad content that doesn't deserve zaps

birdeye21

What have you learned from Stacker News?

If I zap 1 sat or 100 sats in one upvote for your comment, it will get the same trend ranking.
But if 100 stackers will zap you 1 sat then it will have a better ranking position... you understand what I mean?
The amount of sats I will zap you is more like an appreciation for the content , from me, but the vote remain just one.

I myself I have specific ranks in offering sats: 10 - 21 - 100 - 1000 - 2100 etc depending on how I see that content important for me. This is something that you cannot find elsewhere.