599 sats \ 19 replies \ @DarthCoin 10 Oct 2023
And this is only talking about what we can "see" on public LN explorers... not counting PRIVATE NODES with private channels, that seems everybody is ignoring them...
reply
355 sats \ 1 reply \ @Rsync25 OP 10 Oct 2023
They always ignore private nodes, they only want public nodes with compliance rule
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 10 Oct 2023
🎯🎯🎯
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 10 Oct 2023
Easy to ignore what you do not see.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 10 Oct 2023
I am happy that they do not see... Let them mumble into the darkness
reply
0 sats \ 14 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 10 Oct 2023
You didn't read it then if that's what you think it is about.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 10 Oct 2023
Page 17 is showing only public nodes? Where I'm missing?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 10 Oct 2023
Please explain me how River will know about all private nodes and channels.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 10 Oct 2023
Good question
reply
0 sats \ 10 replies \ @DarthCoin 10 Oct 2023
I read it all.
reply
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 10 Oct 2023
Then you must have missed all the private routing and private data sharing metrics.
reply
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @DarthCoin 10 Oct 2023
Please show me the metrics of my private nodes included in that chart.
See page no.5 - table of contents of that report.
I see none
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 10 Oct 2023
"Lightning nodes are servers run by participants in the network that allow users to send and
receive Lightning payments. There are 1518k public Lightning nodes as of September
2023, with five data sources (Bitcoin Visuals, CoinMetrics, Mempool, Amboss, Glassnode)
providing different numbers due to the complexities of mapping the entire network"
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 10 Oct 2023
That's one section. Go back and read the beginning and the other sections.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Rsync25 OP 10 Oct 2023
River uses a methodology exclude private node. This is in the first pages. I'm not attacking River. I'm questing facts.
view replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 10 Oct 2023
How many private nodes and channels exist right now?
reply on another page
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 10 Oct 2023
wrong
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 10 Oct 2023
Conditional acceptance:
I will agree with your statement if you can show me the metrics of my private nodes and channels.
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 10 Oct 2023
Is it specific to your node? No. Does it show metrics about private data? Yes.
Not sure why you're so thick headed here, there's plenty of private data they have that is not only based on public explorer data.
I guess many people still don't know lightning isn't fully private and there's actually some data they know that others don't.
reply on another page
894 sats \ 0 replies \ @sebastix 10 Oct 2023
Woah! This report is longer than the BitVM whitepaper. Damn....information overload and time shortage stress here. I must resist reading and get some sleep first ;-)
reply
894 sats \ 0 replies \ @birdeye21 10 Oct 2023
So much interesting data packed in here…thanks for sharing it
We need to recruit Wouters to SN!
reply
533 sats \ 0 replies \ @kr 10 Oct 2023
full report here
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @Alby 11 Oct 2023
Glad to be part of these numbers, with all of you. Cheers!
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @jeff 11 Oct 2023
6.6M "Routed Transactions" in August 2023.
More than 36% of the base layer's throughput.
Bitcoin doesn't do 7 txn / second anymore!
reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @022f6b28d9 10 Oct 2023 freebie
Little by little it will sptead
reply
12 sats \ 1 reply \ @adexmakai4211 10 Oct 2023
Lightning network has truly scale up Bitcoin but some people don't know this yet. I just discovered this myself. I am not fading anymore.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 10 Oct 2023
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 10 Oct 2023
Graphic of lightning companies from the report
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitcoinIsTheFuture 10 Apr
And going!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sebastix 12 Oct 2023
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @tomlaies 11 Oct 2023
While this is very impressive, I have changed my mind about how important this number is. It does not seem to correlate with Bitcoin adoption. Especially it seems to show adoption inside the Bitcoin community not adoption into the Bitcoin community.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lumor 11 Oct 2023
Even without the internal traffic of SN?! 🙂
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ladyluck 11 Oct 2023
We will double in the next 2 yrs
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @MLBofficialscorer 10 Oct 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 10 Oct 2023
Didn't mean to respond from survivor account. That is pretty good but with growing adoption this should accelerate in the next couple years.
reply