Would you rather we create the ~econ sub or would you prefer you/someone who actually knows a lot about econ launch and nuture it?
That makes a lot of sense. I'd be willing to put time into sourcing good content, and I suspect @Undisciplined would as well since they started the Meta Econ Takeover
reply
I will happily vacate the meta sub, if and when there is an option to post in an econ sub, and I am open to whatever is required to launch and nurture it.
reply
Apologies if this is a silly question. Is the ~bitcoin sub curated/nurtured by users at all?
reply
It took significant effort to get started and especially to start it required me making sure good bitcoin content wasn’t ignored and new comers were engaged. I also spent several hours a day sourcing content.
As time goes on I can do less of this but it’s still an hour or more of my average day.
Sadly theses don’t turn on like a faucet. Someone has to commit to dancing alone for as long as it takes to attract other dancers and even then they have to keep dancing until there’s so many people no one notices they’ve stopped.
~nostr and ~tech are relatively dead because no one is very energized to make those subs what they should be.
Does that make sense?
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 18 Oct 2023
Someone has to commit to dancing alone for as long as it takes to attract other dancers and even then they have to keep dancing until there’s so many people no one notices they’ve stopped.
you surely already know this, but someone just has to link this video
edit: lol, i just realized that tbh, the second follower looks a bit like @supertestnet
reply
That video is great, it does take some guts to be the first follower, so to speak
reply
deleted by author
reply
I enjoy it because it’s just hanging out here but some of it is not casual usage.
reply
It's not. You can post anything and @k00b might complain if it's in the wrong sub but other than that, nothing happens, lol
But on the other hand, you could say it's nurtured by everyone by posting or zapping good content :)
But I think that wasn't what you meant?
reply