related posts
192 sats \ 0 replies \ @elvismercury 24 Oct 2023
Nice measured response. Shinobi is a good one.
reply
150 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 24 Oct 2023
Title bro
reply
203 sats \ 0 replies \ @kr OP 24 Oct 2023
fixed bro 😂
reply
137 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 24 Oct 2023
I still struggle to put this in perspective. The sentiment on the mailing lists suggest that while this attack is a lot like all the others, it's the most profitable and practical. Yet the public facing side of this is "it's just like all the others, nothing has changed, don't worry." It seems like we could do better.
reply
152 sats \ 1 reply \ @TonyGiorgio 25 Oct 2023
I think after some of the mitigations put into place, it's manageable and can be rendered as not profitable. Before the fixes, it could have been utilized but require deep technical skill and know how to pull off.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 25 Oct 2023
That's a helpful framing. From what I read it seemed like "rendered as not profitable" was still up for debate.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @satsbridge 26 Oct 2023
Here you can find better explanation
#294221
reply