2 New bug reports DELETED from Samourai Wallet's Gitlab Repo \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

2 New bug reports DELETED from Samourai Wallet's Gitlab Repo bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5471645.0

3021 sats \ 44 comments \ @kruw 25 Oct 2023 bitcoin

view all related items

1275 sats \ 2 replies \ @tetsu_tamasi 25 Oct 2023

if you using samourai you ngmi

15 sats \ 1 reply \ @SatoshisSkeleton 26 Oct 2023

Explain....

57 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 27 Oct 2023

https://github.com/nopara73/ScamouraiWallet/blob/master/README.md

110 sats \ 0 replies \ @Dash_1971 26 Oct 2023

FUD

106 sats \ 25 replies \ @Rsync25 25 Oct 2023

FUD of the Wasabi against Samourai

449 sats \ 24 replies \ @kepford 25 Oct 2023

Would be nice if devs could act like adults. I say this as a dev.

130 sats \ 16 replies \ @anon 25 Oct 2023

The problem lies with Samourai, who has created coinjoin software so bad it is indistinguishable from a fed backdoor. If those devs were adults, actually intending to create a secure coinjoin implementation, they'd fix those issues. They have not.

Hopefully, they're just children rather than feds.

25 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rsync25 25 Oct 2023

Only Samourai have issues? Any Coinjoin implementation have

20 sats \ 1 reply \ @SatoshisSkeleton 26 Oct 2023

Woah. It's that bad hey?

I've never used coinjoins... seems like a hot wallet honeypot tbh

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kruw OP 26 Oct 2023

Trezor offers coinjoins with full privacy for cold wallets.

0 sats \ 12 replies \ @kepford 25 Oct 2023

Interesting, I'd love to read about this fed backdoor thing... all I have ever heard is childish rock throwing from both sides frankly. Very few mature explanations of tradeoffs.

0 sats \ 11 replies \ @kepford 25 Oct 2023

Surely there is a well written explanation out there of all the trust issues with Samourai.

1210 sats \ 10 replies \ @kruw OP 25 Oct 2023

Here's Peter Todd: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPNFdhZUGmk And Greg Maxwell: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.msg51128834#msg51128834

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @kepford 25 Oct 2023

So this is about the default Samourai mobile wallet? IE if you aren't running your own Dojo? I've heard this debate between the two teams. See, when you don't explain WHY you don't like x and you don't debate it fairly in the way those you oppose would agree with you lose credibility with me. Peter Todd doesn't seem to be being clear with the tradeoffs. Its much easier and fun to just say x sucks.

2 sats \ 0 replies \ @shyfire 25 Oct 2023

I find it very weird to think of someone who is coinjoing but is also not using their own node... like who even does that?

reply on another page

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @kruw OP 25 Oct 2023

I agree- Samourai continues to decline any debates, I would really love an explanation from them myself.

view replies

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 25 Oct 2023

I had a feeling this was a waste of time. Sorry I asked about this.

reply on another page

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 25 Oct 2023

Thanks... a 1 hour video... wow.

100 sats \ 0 replies \ @kruw OP 25 Oct 2023

It's the very first question in the video, you don't have to watch the whole thing.

reply on another page

100 sats \ 6 replies \ @Rsync25 25 Oct 2023

Me too. Kruw is a Wasabi developer and people from Samourai confirmed it for me, and I also checked on BitcoinTalk and it was confirmed again.

Sometimes we don't need to FUD each other because of ego. I think this fight is endless nonsense.

11 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 25 Oct 2023

https://i.postimg.cc/fydsK3N3/mixers-monkey-fight.jpg

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 25 Oct 2023

In my many years of working in tech I've developed a pretty quick BS detector. Sometimes folks just suck at explaining things but most of the time these people don't really understand something well enough explain it. Instead they just just say x sucks because of y and never explain x or y. Then act like you're a dummy because you don't believe them. Its a special kind of person.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rsync25 25 Oct 2023

Haha. True

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @kruw OP 25 Oct 2023

It's called "Peer Review", and it's not FUD, read the issues for yourself.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 25 Oct 2023

Ah, so this is the reproducible builds thing.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kruw OP 25 Oct 2023

No, not at all.

15 sats \ 3 replies \ @shyfire 25 Oct 2023

Issue 1, "Negative Value Toxic Dust" seems like much ado about nothing. It's only in vary rare cases that you will run into this, and most of the time the toxic change amount is too significant to simply roll into the miner fee. If anything this is a feature request.

Issue 2, "Coordinator Fee Address Reuse" this feels like a stretch calling it a bug. So what if the coordinator is reusing addresses? Not like it impacts users in any way.

1212 sats \ 1 reply \ @benthecarman 25 Oct 2023

For issue 2, Wasabi was hounded by samouria for years for reusing the fee address. It is quite ironic

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @shyfire 25 Oct 2023

Haha lol, I was not aware of that. That is indeed highly entertaining.

12 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bitcoinity 25 Oct 2023 freebie

Thank you for actually reading

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 26 Oct 2023

Lol who among us hasn't done this with an annoying colleagues emails, delete them pretend I never got them and tell them to resend it and it buys me a few more days

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @BITC0IN 25 Oct 2023

not a good look

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 26 Oct 2023

All the smack they talk on Twitter (X) called me a boot licker because I asked about how to solve bitcoin crimes besides the nonsense bitcoiners say with “old fashioned police work”

As a victim of such crime you bet your ass I would pay someone to track addresses and hopefully catch the thieves who stole from me