reply on: SN is a lot of fun lately \ stacker news ~meta

11 sats \ 11 replies \ @shyfire 2 Nov 2023 \ on: SN is a lot of fun lately meta

deleted by author

142 sats \ 1 reply \ @Longtermwizard 2 Nov 2023

@nemo

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 2 Nov 2023

deleted by author

31 sats \ 7 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 2 Nov 2023

deleted by author

11 sats \ 0 replies \ @shyfire 2 Nov 2023

thx!

10 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 2 Nov 2023

some user feedback would be nice but maybe we need hidden replies for that first or DMs

401 sats \ 2 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 2 Nov 2023

We could probably toast successful delete command in this case

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 2 Nov 2023

ohhh, good idea! but will be interesting how to communicate this back to the client

227 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 2 Nov 2023

We could set a flag on the item that indicates delete scheduled. We could also just parse for delete directives client side since it’s a common JS function, though that’s not a guarantee it was successfully scheduled

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @elvismercury 2 Nov 2023

I can't quite interpret the Github stream -- does that mean that DMs are pending, via NIP 44? What's the relation btwn the two?

162 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 2 Nov 2023

Ah yes, there isn't a lot of discussion in the Github ticket but we discussed internally that we want to use NIP-44 for DMs. So yes, DMs are waiting for NIP-44 to get audited.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Zepasta 2 Nov 2023

deleted by author