For glyph character languages, I think visually, because every character is the same size and every character is a syllable, it becomes easier to see when a line has more or less characters, or if a line has more or less syllables. That is especially apparent if each line is separated by a line break, where you can just look at a poem and see if each line has the same number of syllables. Compared that to English, I have to read each line to verify the same thing. Also, visually, it looks more uniform with each line being the same length for glyph languages.

Another thing I find interesting is rhyming. When you rhyme in English, you rhyme the last syllable; but when you rhyme in Chinese, you not only rhyme the last syllable, but you also rhyme the tone, because Chinese is a tonal language. As a result, dialects with more tones (i.e. Cantonese with 9 tones) becomes harder to rhyme than dialects with less tones (i.e. Mandarin with 4 tones).

In terms of traditional or simplified characters, stick with the traditional set. To me, traditional characters is the standard and the truth. Simplified characters is just an abomination created by the dictatorial CCP to try to central plan language with their hubris. The CCP successfully created a character set that had shed the traditional wisdom and history, where the characters evolved over time from pictograms; just like how they shed the traditional wisdom and history of Confucianism.