pull down to refresh

33 sats \ 16 replies \ @Zepasta 20 Nov 2023 \ on: How would you attack self-custody? bitcoin
deleted by author
write
preview
228 sats \ 14 replies \ @davidw 20 Nov 2023
NVK says hi... https://twitter.com/nvk/status/1726392947543867640
reply
11 sats \ 13 replies \ @Zepasta 20 Nov 2023
deleted by author
reply
10 sats \ 12 replies \ @davidw 20 Nov 2023
His point is that even Raspberry Pi hardware cannot be trusted these days. I should have made that clearer.
reply
0 sats \ 11 replies \ @Zepasta 20 Nov 2023
deleted by author
reply
10 sats \ 10 replies \ @0330830bf9 21 Nov 2023
No hardware can be. Shouldn't trust coldcard especially.
This is why 2:2 is necessary to mitigate any single compromised supply chain.
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @TSW OP 21 Nov 2023
Curious to learn why you would use a 2:2 and not a 2:3 or another setup where you protect yourself from a single point of failure?
view all 6 replies
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Zepasta 21 Nov 2023 freebie
With a DIY solution like SeedSigner you are not trusting the hardware, the data is stored temporarly on RAM and wiped when you plug the cable off. Its completely different from an hardware wallet that stores data inside permanently.
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TSW OP 21 Nov 2023
If you really believe that is the only attack vector then you haven't read my entire post I guess...
reply