pull down to refresh
829 sats \ 3 replies \ @OgFOMK 22 Dec 2023 \ on: #Territories: What's the moderation plan for posts that clearly break the rules? meta
I read through some of these responses and the original post. What came to me is the idea of having a kick out option. This can go to the kicked territory.
So you are not deleting or hiding a post where someone paid to post but you are kicking the post out of a curated section.
No Agenda has an Art Generator. Adam and John, the hosts of no Agenda will go through and comment on the art. The artists love it and keep submitting. Sometimes the critique is harsh but so what!
This can be done here too. Like these steps:
- Post
- Post kicked to "kicked".
- A message is provided: " You got kicked out! Don't worry, your post is here in the kicked territory. Put up a bounty and the kicker can comment on why you got kicked out the kicker can guide you toward a successful post in the future. "
- Message goes to the kicker for review per bounty.
- Kicker can respond by 5a. Raising the bounty for review 5b. Answering and getting the bounty 5c. Ignoring and just ghost the nonsense 5d. Pass-out: "I don't want to deal with this, here's a bounty and anyone can respond."
- Original Post gets feedback or is ghosted.
If someone is willing to pay sats for spam then they can pay for curated content. The kicked territory just cleans up everyone's territory by sending the mess out. Meanwhile those who weren't paying attention can improve their posts and those of a territory can improve loyalty by commenting and getting rewarded or retarded.
Kicked can even show stats on kicked bounties, best kicker, best kick back, and super grifters who paid ridiculous bounties for placement. Even a grift master who will accept any bounty.
I hope this makes sense but the summary is to kick out bad content, allow it to be reviewed (and bring extra sats) and make friends by being tough and increasing intellectual competition.
I would add one more option to your proposal. Instead of the territory owner only being able to extradite a post to the kicked territory, the owner could extradite it to any other territory. This would help organize information more efficiently.
However, this raises a question about price differences between territories. Who would pay or receive the price difference?
reply
reply
Good point. I think there is something to this. Perhaps in the feedback you can suggest territories and the original post person can act by moving to that territory and paying the sats to join.
reply