327 sats \ 2 replies \ @supertestnet 26 Dec 2023 freebie
I'm so happy this exists. It is an excellent demonstration of the principle "your node, your rules" and it is pretty easy to modify the bash script to enforce other conditions too. You can modify it to enforce bip300, or CTV, or any other soft fork really. Though meant as a joke, it's a genuinely wonderful idea imo and I want to do some videos outlining how it works and how to expand upon it for more purposes.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @rijndael 26 Dec 2023
<3
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @inverselarp 26 Dec 2023
It filters out blocks by given criteria. So you can use it in hypothetical future when bip300 or ctv will be in default node implementation
reply
142 sats \ 1 reply \ @Murch 27 Dec 2023
It seems to me that most commenters here are completely missing the point here.
@rijndael is providing exactly the tool that many inscription opponents are claiming to demand and thereby demonstrating that their stance is untenable, since none of them will run it.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @rijndael 28 Dec 2023
Thank you @Murch :-)
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @BitByBit21 26 Dec 2023
The Wizard Clowns know the only way their scam can survive is by forking the blockchain. Since this is a BCV/BCH-style suicide, they want us to fork off. Don't fall for this trap!
reply
13 sats \ 0 replies \ @rijndael 26 Dec 2023
You are currently falling for the trap
reply
2 sats \ 3 replies \ @pakovm 26 Dec 2023
So it basically rejects anything post-segwit, right?
Any change ever introduced to Bitcoin is pure heresy, WE SHOULD ALL USE THE ORIGINAL CLIENT!
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Murch 27 Dec 2023
It rejects any block that contains an inscription as invalid, thereby forking off at the height of the first block with an inscription.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @pakovm 28 Dec 2023
Hence, solving the inscriptions bug and keeping the purity of the system as Godtoshi intended, not evolving the network ever!!!!!!! /s
reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @elysia 26 Dec 2023
Nothing should ever change with new information! 1776 baby!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ladyluck 26 Dec 2023
So node aren't clean enough such that they need purifiers
reply
100 sats \ 7 replies \ @Eobard 26 Dec 2023
deleted by author
reply
181 sats \ 6 replies \ @south_korea_ln 26 Dec 2023
rot13maxi is the one doing the ordinal spamming here... I guess his purifier tool is a bit tongue-in-cheek.
reply
4 sats \ 4 replies \ @orthwyrm 26 Dec 2023
Yes, I think he's even doing some work for Taproot Wizards.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @BitByBit21 26 Dec 2023
I'm having a fun discussion with him on Nostr:
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @rijndael 26 Dec 2023
Its true!
Read the code, run it or dont. Your node, your rules.
reply
121 sats \ 1 reply \ @Eobard 26 Dec 2023
deleted by author
reply
250 sats \ 0 replies \ @rijndael 26 Dec 2023
🫡
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Eobard 26 Dec 2023
deleted by author
reply