Again, it'll largely depend on why they got into Bitcoin in the first place, and if their reasoning changed, whether they took the appropriate precautions or not.

Example, and this obviously generalist, if you see Bitcoin as a tool you'll use it as a tool. If you see it as a specupative asset ripe for trading, you'll not worry about KYC and will likely be looking to fiat-out in the end, for better or worse.

Also brings up the interesting question of how many bitcoiners might be lying to themselves.

Bitcoin has done more for many countries in less than a decade than fiat has, mostly regardless of price - And I only say mostly because if price continued to be low, the utility of it wouldn't have propagated as fast. It's successfully withstood nation-wide attacks. It's helped thousands lift themselves from extreme poverty and escape countries without losing life-savings kind of wealth. And has offered alternative routes around CBDCs. Price increases are THE bonus. They're part of the mechanics of Bitcoin no doubt, but a bonus nonetheless. Unconfiscatabe wealth was its reasoning for being created.