How is the specific size of the size limit not arbitrary?
My issue is with the way the sentence is phrased, making it sound as if the “arbitrary “ blocksize limit causes “bottlenecks” and “increases network costs”, not even a hat tip to the design decisions behind the current block size. Sure there is a mention further down, but leading with the FUD is the giveaway here IMO.
But I’m not surprised since they are shitcoiners that support the abomination that is BCH.
I'll never use this service, period.
reply