reply on: Rethinking Lightning \ stacker news ~bitcoin

498 sats \ 16 replies \ @oliverweiss 6 Jan \ on: Rethinking Lightning bitcoin

How could you stack +7k sats in just 5 mins after publishing the post? I wouldn’t be able to read it in five minutes.

1031 sats \ 2 replies \ @TNStacker 6 Jan

boosted?

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 6 Jan

We show you when it's boosted by the author. Or you might have meant "boosted" as in anon zaps or alt accounts

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 6 Jan

Yes, not self-boosted

10 sats \ 12 replies \ @GrinSingularity 6 Jan

I thought exactly the same thing!

821 sats \ 11 replies \ @k00b 6 Jan

His frens probably zapped it anticipating it would be a top post.

1287 sats \ 4 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 6 Jan

I invest into ben with the expectation that I will make a return based on other people's work

10 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 7 Jan

This post is one of the better securities on offer today.

43 sats \ 2 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 7 Jan

Well unfortunately you decided to not pay out for early upvotes today. I'm lucky I made some top comments to make up for my sats lost on Ben.

187 sats \ 1 reply \ @benthecarman OP 7 Jan

Lfg

1010 sats \ 0 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 7 Jan

You've earned it, it's a great post. Can I have my sats back tho? 😭

442 sats \ 3 replies \ @GrinSingularity 6 Jan

Maybe the writer is really amazing and with our eyes closed we have to step on lightning! Nevertheless, I will read the whole thing. Not in less than 5 minutes :)

10 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 6 Jan

I zapped ben some sats for every word I read

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @oliverweiss 6 Jan

Did you read this post until the end then? :)

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 6 Jan

yes, just finished

243 sats \ 0 replies \ @orthwyrm 6 Jan

Can confirm that I do this all the time.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @oliverweiss 6 Jan

Can I be their friend too? LOL