Stacker Saloon \ stacker news

pull down to refresh

147 comments \ @saloon 13 Jan \ yesterday

Howdy there, partner! Welcome on into the Stacker Saloon.

Saddle on up to a stool and spill the beans about your day, fire away with them questions, or let loose and give us the lowdown on your wild and woolly life. We're all ears, so don't hold back!

We're open round the clock, so mosey on in whenever you please!

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @cryotosensei 14 Jan

Always a happy day when I can earn some sats via Fountain app. Never giving up is key.

https://m.stacker.news/12139

What podcasts do you all listen to on Fountain?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 14 Jan

sometimes I would listen to those what @DarthCoin boosted. 🤫

99 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 14 Jan

Continuing to hack on ML ingest for search. On the sample I made yesterday it was a pretty significant improvement. The ingest keeps choking though due to tensor size even though I'm truncating the input significantly ... so much glue.

99 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 14 Jan

Update: found a model that truncates for me!

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @TheWildHustle 13 Jan

My wife is eating four slices of wheat bread dipped in hot sauce......

Not sure if she's pregnant, or just plebbin it until the god candles appear.

I just saw her reach for more hot sauce. She looked inside the bottle after killing it, not sure if her eyes were playing tricks on her. Dont trust verify freaks!

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @elvismercury 14 Jan

I would have said that live-tweeting it might not have been the best move, but it's now two hours later, you can follow up.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheWildHustle 14 Jan

I've never seen another human being eat bread dipped in hot sauce. I'm down to start a support group #onefreakatatime

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jakoyoh629 13 Jan

https://image.nostr.build/f6d92bd75e3aa8f920436f4c986c914a833b860d083a3435d9d1c19356b3f85c.jpg

56 sats \ 3 replies \ @macarena 13 Jan

Getting my 🤠

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryotosensei 14 Jan

Congrats! May it last long.

Tomorrow is my 20th day with the cowboy hat. New record!

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitcoinIsTheFuture 14 Jan

Congrats! It’s a wild ride!

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 13 Jan

Hang on tight!

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @jakoyoh629 13 Jan

[SNIP] When we are in wild west mode, posts should be labeled With something

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 13 Jan

Like what?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jakoyoh629 14 Jan

Like That

https://i.ibb.co/LPZzM23/image.jpg

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitcoinIsTheFuture 13 Jan

Listening to Bitcoin podcasts while shoveling out in the Midwest blizzard!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 13 Jan

Howdy!

Last chance to throw your hat in the ring for 2k sats NFL wildcard weekend bounty.

#386142

456 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan

wow, first time receiving sats boom from @sn 🥳 now I see why so many comments on Meme Monday and fun fact Friday!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @RealCoachAndy 13 Jan

The weekend has arrived my friends and what a great feeling it is to finally get some well deserved rest, after putting a lot of effort, energy and focus on our goals it's time to get a treat, doesn't have to be food, it can be anything you want, perhaps you saw a nice shirt or a pair of shorts, a cap, a dress, a bouquet of nice flowers for the wife or husband, maybe a nice walk on the park or at the beach, anything my friend, you deserve it, you're worthy of it and don't you forget that. You're important and you matter, also because you're awesome, so there's that! I wish you all a phenomenal weekend, may it be filled with love, joy and success. As always my good friend, stay frosty.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 13 Jan

Howdy Cowboys!

Have a great weekend and don't sell your bitcoin to BlackRock!

Stack Sats and stay humble.

https://m.stacker.news/12073

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan freebie

music of today

and fun fact

People don't call each other with Mr or Miss in Turkey, but use Bey for male and Hanım for female, so it would be Ekzyis Bey for @ekzyis, David Bey for @davidw 😂🤓 much exotic!

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @davidw 13 Jan

That's cool. Reminds me when everyone goes around calling their other halves 'bae'

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan

bey is more fun! 😂

1717 sats \ 2 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 13 Jan

@ekzyis Thank you for the referral to Mr. Robot via one of your posts. I really enjoyed the first season! Just began season 2, so no spoilers please! ;)

231 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 13 Jan freebie

No worries and glad that you like it! Now I can say I had an impact in the life of @WeAreAllSatoshi, lol :)

I also want to talk more about Mr. Robot with others since it's one of my favorite shows (it probably is my favorite show). Should have started talking about Mr. Robot on here a lot sooner! I thought everyone must have already seen it because it was that good, lol

We can reply to each other a lot of times and then you can tell me what happened in season 1 since we can use view replies as some kind of spoiler warning for other stackers, lol

I forgot what happened in season 1. It's all mixed up in my brain. It's been some time.

719 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 13 Jan

I had to wait for the edit window to close because I know you too well lol

Good idea about using the deep comments for spoiler support. That just might work!

I had heard of the show by name but I just never looked into what it was about so I never knew I’d like it. It seems like a show that would be very popular among the SN crowd.

484 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 13 Jan

I got a couple more PRs merged into opcode-explained this week. Happy to be able to make doc improvements while I have limited free time, still contributing to the Bitcoin open source community!

100 sats \ 0 replies \ @PlebLab 13 Jan

https://m.stacker.news/12068

Join us at 11:00am CST for the first TopBuilder workshop.

Agenda:

How to Apply and Succeed at Wolf by Brian Atchure
Top Builder Roadmap Ahead by Car González
Building with LLM's with Marcus Workman

Come to PlebLab or watch online:

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@pbs_plebs/streams Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/pleblab Zap.Stream: https://zap.stream/p/npub1an84q6c03wml5lf0uwcqcr20ydwv0t0lvv0xktlcfs9seattef8sdhz6yg

More details at https://www.meetup.com/pleb-lab/

785 sats \ 0 replies \ @PlebLab 13 Jan

https://m.stacker.news/12065

Announcing Austin Kelsay from plebdevs as a TopBuilder mentor.

Join us today at 11:00am CST for TopBuilder kick off: https://buff.ly/3SdIWrP

3212 sats \ 44 replies \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

I've reached something of an equilibrium in my initial search for the optimal default zap. For a couple weeks now, I've been hovering around 270.

Now I want to refine my approach.

Rather than just zapping everything I like 1/1000th of my wallet balance, I'd like to add some nuance. Here are the terms of my next experiment:

Normal/small comments get 1/10,000 of my balance (currently 27 sats)
Normal/short posts or insightful comments get 1/1000 of my balance (currently 270 sats)
Longer thoughtful posts get 1/100 of my balance (currently 2700 sats)

I'll be utilizing the turbo zaps feature for this, so watch out for accidentally large zaps!

How are other people's (@ekzyis and @elvismercury) current zap experiments going?

270 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 14 Jan freebie

How are other people's (@ekzyis and @elvismercury) current zap experiments going?

Am I not writing every day how my current zap experiment is going? :)

But I guess you are right, I kind of lost to share what I learned in these posts like I did in the beginning.

Will think more about this and reply here or create a post or just add them to my next Z2Z post.

27 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 14 Jan

I just meant quick takeaways. How has your experiment changed your own zapping behavior? Have you noticed changes in other users? How have your rewards been affected? That kind of stuff.

27 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 14 Jan

Bookmarked

27 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 13 Jan

Food for thought…..

4248 sats \ 17 replies \ @elvismercury 13 Jan

I like this method a lot -- I'll steal it, or something like it, after January. I'm slowly bleeding out from 1k zaps, and it's produced a couple of informal effects on myself: I zap zero in cases where I would have zapped my old default of 22x. There's a serious friction to the floor being 4x more than your old floor. I could, with great effort, over-ride it, but part of the game was to see what would happen, and that's what's happening.

Based on @ekzyis's kick-ass reporting, I suspect that I could be slightly in the black if I posted a lot, but I just don't have the time to do that. This needs greater investigation, since it's at tension with another thing I believe 100%, which is the outsized benefits of action. But the type of action matters a lot: in the time I devote to SN, I spend it overwhelmingly on comments, and I spend a lot of mental effort on them. But a comment is extremely unlikely to get you enough zaps to keep you in the black; so it's clear where effort should be allocated if you're looking to not get rekt.

Anyway, I think I'll get through January without blowing my balance to zero, and while this isn't about making money, I don't have unlimited appetite to lose money, either, so maybe your methodology will help with that, along with more effort at posting [1].

The thing I cared the most about -- to show people who are producing things that I think are undervalued that they are seen and cared for, with the hope of inspiring them to do more of it -- seems to have not manifested. Still a negligible number of link posts with good descriptions -- you and @siggy47 are the main exceptions that come to mind. Still very little experimentation in form or different perspectives besides the obvious btc ones. But a ship like that will turn slowly, if at all, so I haven't given up. I think the bigger lever for this is modeling. @ekzyis and @davidw have been burning it up on this one lately, and if I find it inspiring and thought-provoking, I'm sure others do, too.

[1] Ironically, this should probably have been an interim report post. So meta.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

I zap zero in cases where I would have zapped my old default of 22x

I've noticed myself doing this a little bit with comments that aren't nothing, but also where 270 seemed a bit rich. Someone mentioned having a low zap that basically just acknowledges the other person. So 27 from me is sort of a "don't leave me hanging" zap.

1556 sats \ 11 replies \ @k00b 13 Jan

a comment is extremely unlikely to get you enough zaps to keep you in the black; so it's clear where effort should be allocated if you're looking to not get rekt.

I'd love to make great comments competitive with great posts. Comments on home aren't great feng shui, but maybe we can surface hot global comments some other way.

451 sats \ 7 replies \ @elvismercury 13 Jan

That would be cool -- the context thing would be an interesting challenge, though a fun one, and it would help w/ notifications, too. You wrap the thing you're being notified about in a bundle of context so it can be interpreted.

(Perhaps could also incentivize people to make their comments more 'sovereign' in that they contain enough ingredients to be interpretable with minimal other context.)

You could always just have a feed of "hot comments" treated as a territory? If you wanted to not do something bespoke. But what the hell do I know. Well, I know that such a thing would probably be more interesting to me than the post-centric version, as I can dig into any conversational cul-de-sac regardless of topic if it's hopping, but many things I won't see because the post's topic is not a particular interest of mine.

1589 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

This might be a good example of what you're talking about.

No one would have any reason to suspect this interesting little chat, that belonged in ~meta, was in a ~Stacker_Sports post, but it would have been nice for more people to have weighted in on it.

451 sats \ 5 replies \ @elvismercury 13 Jan

Perfect illustration, thanks for providing one. It's fun to imagine how one could display this on some kind of feed, and how its candidacy for such a feed could be determined. First thing that comes to mind is a weighted-subtree thing, e.g., sum up the zaps of the whole subtree, and then show the highest ones; or the subtree up to some depth, or only top-level sub-trees bc the first thing I said is computationally unfeasible...

And then what to show for it? The parent comment? An LLM-summary of the subtree? The parent comment + a summary? Lots of cool things you could pilot. Harder to figure out how to do user influence on top of it, though -- graph embeddings beyond my paygrade, but maybe some simpler way would be 60% as good.

484 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 14 Jan

And then what to show for it?

That's tough, because the interesting topic could have started anywhere in the tree. Just showing the parent comment might not give any sense of why that subtree generated so much value.

Even if there are good LLM summaries of the conversation, they will still have to decide where to send users who want to check out the thread.

451 sats \ 1 reply \ @elvismercury 14 Jan

If there's a high-value embedded comment lower in the subtree, it would hopefully have been zapped appropriately, though, right? And practically speaking, it's not usually that onerous to read a subtree. It's rare for them to cross the "see more replies" boundary, empirically. Or at least, that's my sense.

view replies

1656 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 14 Jan

top-level sub-trees

This is something we've been planning to do, ie rank sub-tree roots by their sub-tree's zap sum. Posts, being sub-tree roots themselves, could also see their ranking enhanced when they contain a great sub-tree.

We'd do this when writing the zap at a cost log(zap_depth), ie one update for every ancestor.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 15 Jan

lol subconscious alerted me to my error on my walk this morning. It's zap_depth not log(zap_depth). Sometimes I wish I were an exacting person.

reply on another page

618 sats \ 0 replies \ @davidw 13 Jan freebie

I like that idea, the tricky thing is comments require more context. So if there were a way to make it as “top conversations” than just comments, I think it might have more success.

Most people are not aware that ranking for upvoting top comments is WAY easier than ranking for upvoting posts. To me that’s plenty of incentive already to engage with comments and a way for them to compete with posts.

Comments can be extremely detailed and valuable, but there is plenty of work in posts, especially those generally speaking with more sats & longer word counts.

484 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

I know it's already part of how things become "hot", but maybe there could be another feed specifically for hot conversations that only weighs the zaps to comments. (or, something like that)

27 sats \ 0 replies \ @davidw 13 Jan

I just realised I edited my comment to say the exact same thing as yours 😂

357 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 13 Jan

Now that's a great comment.

27 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 13 Jan

I think the bigger lever for this is modeling

what do you mean with modeling?

1103 sats \ 1 reply \ @elvismercury 13 Jan

Illustrating a principle with a concrete act, e.g., if you want to see more posts that surface old content and add value to it, provide commentary that synthesizes things, etc., then you should create those things yourself and model it for others.

361 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 13 Jan freebie

Ahh, I see. Related to this quote:

Be the change you want to see in the world

I feel like a web crawler that exclusively crawls SN for good content to include in these Z2Z posts.

stole that acronym from @davidw here

451 sats \ 1 reply \ @quark 13 Jan

I disabled turbo zap because... you said it. Yes. Accidental clicks will happen. You will see 😅 To zap custom amount you can hold the button and then enter a custom amount there or click the buttons of previous zap amounts. It is safer than turbo zap but slower.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

safer than turbo zap but slower

There are no solutions, only tradeoffs. I want the speed...for now.

451 sats \ 6 replies \ @cryotosensei 13 Jan

So the day I get 2700 sats from you is the day I know I have made it as a content creator 😆

332 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

Or it's just the day you got an accidental double click. Now, if you ever get 27,000 sats, you can be pretty sure I was trying to zap you 2700 for a great post.

451 sats \ 4 replies \ @cryotosensei 14 Jan

lol. Btw how did you come to the conclusion that 270 sats is the optimal zap for you, rather than raising it higher to say, 388 sats?

70 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 14 Jan

It's not inherently fixed here. I explained my search procedure in this post.

Basically, I was looking for the amount that caused me to break even, on average, with my SN usage. That amount happened to be about 270 sats.

451 sats \ 2 replies \ @cryotosensei 14 Jan

Thanks! I read your post before but reading it again made me float over to DarthCoin’s comment and learn that if you donate sats to the pool, you may just receive back your donation (and more) the next day. Gonna try that haha

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 14 Jan

Let me know how it goes.

27 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryotosensei 14 Jan

Just donated 50 sats to the pool haha. I’ll see how things turn out

reply on another page

451 sats \ 2 replies \ @smuglydawg 13 Jan

Interesting experiment, reminds me of the saying a penny for your thoughts. Trying to think of a clever saying for satoshis.

27 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan

or "plant the seed to stack precious sats"

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

"One thousandth of my custodial wallet balance for your thoughts isn't pithiness for you?"

528 sats \ 9 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan freebie

the default zap for me is 210 atm, and the other zapping depends on my mood, so I'm a mood based zapper ( also depends on how much interaction I've with that stacker ) probably not so "good" in terms for the rewards wise, but it's more fun. 🤔

and where's the SSL from yesterday? @ekzyis

Beginning of Secret Sauce Live? I still have 10min to proofread before posting (and another 10min after posting) because I just posted this and I don't want to pay 33% of my wallet to post this post.

210 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

Your mood has probably served you better than whatever strategy most of the other stackers are using.

27 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 13 Jan freebie

Your mood [and authenticity]

ftfy

451 sats \ 6 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan freebie

maybe no strategy is the best strategy? 🤔

feel the force:) and I def noticed that there are more energy in SN some days, but sometimes are really quiet.

210 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

It's hard for most bitcoiners to fight their own stinginess, even when it would clearly benefit them. Without a strategy most of our purse strings get tight.

451 sats \ 4 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan freebie

but Bitcoiners should be mostly rationalists? and according to conservation of energy

The law of conservation of energy states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed - only converted from one form of energy to another.

so zapping sats to someone, something else should be back right? maybe not in sats, but in other forms, it could be new knowledge, fun or something else...🤔

210 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

People aren't rational most of the time. They develop heuristics and operate off of those. The "HODL" mentality is deeply ingrained in the community and it anchors people towards stinginess, even in circumstances where generosity is highly rewarded.

451 sats \ 2 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan freebie

reminds me of a discussion I had with someone - do you know why some chefs are more well-known than others? Not because they actually cook the best, but because they are sharing their "recipes."

sharing often leads to more happiness, e.g. when it comes to food, there are different feelings when you are sharing with others VS eating alone, even with the same food.

so what good does that do even if you got all the Bitcoin in the world but no one there to share with?

view replies

239 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 13 Jan

Seems like a local minimum in mempool fees right now... might be a good time to make some txns if you've been waiting?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nikotsla 13 Jan

Shhhh you wake up the monster!!! hahaha.

21 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 13 Jan

Day 26 of posting mining earnings from the day before: 711 sats on 12Jan2024! Running total: 20,523 sats!

Yesterday's comment

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 14 Jan

Day 27's comment

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @oraltosun 13 Jan

Enjoying linden tea with fresh ginger on SATurday.

https://m.stacker.news/12058

3249 sats \ 25 replies \ @davidw 13 Jan

I've been pulling some stats off SN this last few hours.

Analysing the top stackers but in a new way. Seeing who is top of the pops for 'sats per write' and who is the best 'conversation keeper' with their posts. Not sure how best to present all the tables & keep it in a readable format. Perhaps a vertical PDF. Will try and wrap it up for early next week.

456 sats \ 0 replies \ @elvismercury 14 Jan

This will be so cool to see! Based on your work, I know I don't need to say this, but I am nothing if not redundant, and so: please post methodology when you 'release' the big one!

0 sats \ 17 replies \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

Cool! Any sneak-peak takeaways yet?

847 sats \ 16 replies \ @davidw 13 Jan freebie

Posting on particular Day of Week

https://m.stacker.news/12081

Posting at Time of Day (Eastern time)

https://m.stacker.news/12085

This is taking data from posts over 5k with over sats total (that were not "Satsraisers"). Goes to show posting early for the European market & when people wake-up State-side pays off. Waiting a few more hours leads to more discussion/comments. Time shown is in U.S. Eastern time. Wednesdays, Thursdays (and surprisingly Sundays) have been popular too.

cc. @Natalia if posting just once a week, something to bear in mind 😀

719 sats \ 10 replies \ @davidw 13 Jan freebie

🤠 One more follow-up....

People who are NOT currently cowboys/cowgirls have bigger peaks & troughs. (Current) cowboys continue to stack consistently throughout the week...

https://m.stacker.news/12107

Whereas the opposite is true for comments from cowboys. Way more discussion on their posts, perhaps suggesting we could do more to get "dippers' to engage after posting something of value on SN. They seem extremely active on Sundays, which is a nice opportunity for us to skew the rewards that day perhaps.

(Note: data still from posts with over 5k sats).

456 sats \ 1 reply \ @kurszusz 13 Jan

How I can become a cowboy? :)

451 sats \ 0 replies \ @davidw 13 Jan

Be both curious and generous with your time. Proof of work will see to it that you are rewarded.

27 sats \ 7 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan freebie

interesting, but there are quiet some undergrounds 🤓 did you count them in?

perhaps suggesting we could do more to get "dippers' to engage after posting something of value on SN

what dat mean 🤔 the easiest and best way is do a shoutout in saloon once post something:)

27 sats \ 6 replies \ @davidw 13 Jan freebie

My bad, with poor English. Dipping into something, I use it like it’s temporary. In and out quickly.

When non-cowboys post something (at least this is my interpretation) there’s naturally a little less discussion from everyone. I suspect a big portion of comments from cowboy posts, are from cowboys themselves.

The chart is telling me that others have less time/willingness to be able to do it during the week, which makes sense.

27 sats \ 5 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan freebie

and @Undisciplined is signaling that he is watching us. 😂

When non-cowboys post something (at least this is my interpretation) there’s naturally a little less discussion from everyone. I suspect a big portion of comments from cowboy posts, are from cowboys themselves.

hmmmm, especially when @nemo in town, more fun - dancing in everyone's post, taking all the street!

230 sats \ 3 replies \ @davidw 13 Jan

@nemo must be enjoying the reef right now. The only way I can keep this going is by posting more charts...

Sats per post - current cowboys vs not

https://m.stacker.news/12111

view replies

133 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

Just a gentle nudge for you to keep this interesting conversation going. Pretend like I'm not even here.

reply on another page

27 sats \ 4 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan freebie

I also like posting either in Wed or Thur, works great for my schedule too, and nothing need to stressed about when it's in the middle of the week!

this "Sats Per Post - Posted at Time of Day" is quite interesting.

451 sats \ 3 replies \ @davidw 13 Jan freebie

Definitely is. Something I had witnessed/felt when posting ~6am Eastern but hadn't proven until now. Now I wonder how many sats I have left on the table posting later in the day, once I finally finish editing (versus waiting the extra day).

451 sats \ 2 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan freebie

for me, I noticed the best is 6-10am Eastern time.

Now I wonder how many sats I have left on the table posting later in the day, once I finally finish editing (versus waiting the extra day).

yea, you always post in my late nights 😆

also one more bonus of posting "early" is that you could easily rank into the top post with more zap ranks.

this is the real SSL here @ekzyis

969 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 13 Jan

I had noticed the same with early posts.

I wonder if it's driven by the reward schedule: early posts have more time to climb the ranks and earn more rewards.

Maybe an upcoming rewards experiment can vary the timing of the rewards calculation. cc: @k00b and @ekzyis

451 sats \ 0 replies \ @davidw 13 Jan freebie

Great point. Kind of bizarre how the comments by time of day are the complete opposite to zaps.

People mindlessly zapping with their feet in the mornings, versus commenting whilst munching down a sandwich nearer lunchtime.

reply on another page

210 sats \ 5 replies \ @davidw 13 Jan

Fun Fact Not-Friday... @Natalia has more comments on her posts on average than even @sn (58.2 vs 57.1)

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan

I've been pulling some stats off SN this last few hours

wow, impressive - how did you get those data 👀 is it the SQL that @ekzyis trying to pill me in?

484 sats \ 3 replies \ @davidw 13 Jan

The stats don't take into consideration every post on the site.

I made a python script that pulls any post above 1k sats in rewards and dumps the details into a local spreadsheet for now.

484 sats \ 2 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan freebie

this's one of those skills I lack, would be so nice if get to see it in action. 🤔

https://i.postimg.cc/CxYfVMyR/darth-impressive.gif

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 13 Jan freebie

You're seeing very similar skills in action right now, lol :)

But I know what you mean. More posts!

I'll try to use my automation skills to get faster with my ZtZ posts so I still have time for other things lol

I'm still doing a lot manual.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 13 Jan

Off to cvs to get some household goods.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @smuglydawg 13 Jan

🤠- What are you excited about today?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan

crafting some fun for next week:)

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 13 Jan

Relaxing

60 sats \ 0 replies \ @bief57 13 Jan

Good morning, good afternoon, good night wherever you are

1207 sats \ 4 replies \ @orthwyrm 13 Jan

Day 273 of snailposting everyday 'til BTC hits $100k.

...and 73 push-ups. (20 - 20 - 33)

__@_'-'

231 sats \ 0 replies \ @mango 13 Jan

Day 54 of horseposting everyday

Horse Stance: 2 minutes (Don't want to exert too much before the big day, tomorrow.)

𓃗

https://m.stacker.news/12069

max push-ups: 33

60 sats \ 0 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 13 Jan

🫡

50 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 13 Jan

👍

50 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 13 Jan

Nice push to finish!

594 sats \ 16 replies \ @carlosfandango 13 Jan

Where the snail at? We at 100k already…??

13 sats \ 13 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan

it seems weekends are quite quiet.

0 sats \ 12 replies \ @carlosfandango 13 Jan

‘Too quiet…’

13 sats \ 11 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan

calling @nemo

332 sats \ 9 replies \ @ek 13 Jan

Maybe @nemo is still hungover from Christmas

or as ChatGPT would put it:

@nemo might still be experiencing the effects of Christmas festivities.

664 sats \ 3 replies \ @orthwyrm 13 Jan

For the record @nemo messaged me the other day, and it seems like he wants to take a break from the internet for a while. I don't blame him, this ecosystem does get crazy sometimes.

50 sats \ 2 replies \ @carlosfandango 13 Jan

That’s fair. He was in here quite a lot! And it isn’t that healthy at times…

83 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 15 Jan

https://img.yts.mx/assets/images/movies/dont_worry_darling_2022/large-cover.jpg

view replies

13 sats \ 4 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan

much hangover he must be.

https://i.postimg.cc/R0kNVWjZ/yoda.jpg

13 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 13 Jan

Or maybe @Natalia is @nemo and @DarthCoin? 🤨🕵️‍♀️

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 13 Jan

Oooo. Definitely… good work detective!

reply on another page

13 sats \ 1 reply \ @Natalia 13 Jan

three in one? too much work and responsibilities.

view replies

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 13 Jan

That’s just what we need… lol

73 sats \ 1 reply \ @premitive1 13 Jan

let a man sleep

484 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 13 Jan

If I’m awake the least the snail can be doing is pushing out some press ups! lol (we are actually in the same time zone so I know what time it is)

23 sats \ 0 replies \ @Roll 13 Jan

I m going to walk to the beach with my wife and eat outside as today it s a sunny day and it s the week end :) Wish you a nice one

34 sats \ 4 replies \ @jakoyoh629 13 Jan

https://imgprxy.stacker.news/iwMIzSiEtRmybqqCvm1Pkp88B5AMwQW7NEj07HNkOdQ/rs:fit:960:540/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZS5ub3N0ci5idWlsZC83NTZjNzQzMDMzZGFhYWM1NTI1OTVhYTg3YzFhODlkYzEyMmQ1YWU2MTk5MGQyZTM4NTQ0ZjU3NjkyMzc3OGU1LmpwZw

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan

what's with this photo? I don't quite get it.

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @jakoyoh629 13 Jan

The lady is cleaning the floor manually in an irobot store

11 sats \ 1 reply \ @Natalia 13 Jan freebie

oh hahah - maybe she is a more advanced robot? ( joking! ) 😂

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jakoyoh629 13 Jan

She Is, for sure. Not joking

687 sats \ 2 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan freebie

Did you ever wonder how these beautiful ceramics are being made? well, I did! so I went to see and learn about the process. 👀

And one interesting thing in common I've noticed in these traditional arts is that many motifs are being passed down or accumulated throughout the years, so you don't really need to do everything from scratch. All you need is to be patient and focus and learn from the past, with those good practices and avoid mistakes, then you slowly level up to discover your own unique style, which reminds me, isn't our life the same - learning from history/people who had walked before, avoiding those mistakes, and forging our own unique path, then you pass down your knowledge to others.

https://m.stacker.news/12031 https://m.stacker.news/12032 https://m.stacker.news/12029 https://m.stacker.news/12033

121 sats \ 1 reply \ @davidw 13 Jan

Love reading about stuff like this. Would you consider writing a post about what you learnt during each craft making session?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 13 Jan

could do 👀 then I would never run out of things to write about:)

I really don't understand why so many people have writer's block, I mean all you need is keep doing interesting thing then write about them right? simple hack it is!