pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @sorukumar 5 Feb \ parent \ on: I reran Rene Pickhardt's project on a newer snapshot. Here are the results... bitcoin
I run LND, and in the gossip JSON file, I get a list of all the nodes (~16k) and the channels (~60K). When I combine these two files again to check how many positive capacity channels each node has, more than 7K turns out to be without a channel.
Not sure how CLN and LDK graph output looks like? If you have one, let's connect. It would be interesting to see how they compare to each other.
Oh! I was getting caught up on the word 'active'.
Since the code uses the channels list to make the nodes, only nodes with at least one channel are included in the samples.
In my results, I use LND and I also skip disabled channels.
reply
yes. that makes sense.
I usually put an additional condition of 'capacity' > 0. This filters out a lot of channels...and consequently nodes.
Value Counts for 'capacity' > 0 and 'capacity' == 0:
capacity
Capacity > 0 42472
Capacity == 0 13954
reply
Thanks for your comment! I doubled checked my process and found that channels without policies were also being included.
Here are the updated results:
Uniform
P | FULL LN | Professional subnet ------+-----------+-------------------- 99.9% | 0 | 843342 ------+-----------+-------------------- 99.0% | 0 | 3372695 ------+-----------+-------------------- 97.5% | 971 | 4877749 ------+-----------+-------------------- 90.0% | 9732 | 8256485 ------+-----------+-------------------- 80.0% | 23366 | 11592785 ------+-----------+-------------------- 50.0% | 127162 | 26282557 ------+-----------+-------------------- 33.9% | 349127 | 41021223 ------+-----------+--------------------
Expected Service level
P in the full network & professional subnet for various target amountsamount | FULL LN | Professional subnet ---------+------------+-------------------- 1000 | 97.46% | 99.99% ---------+------------+-------------------- 10000 | 89.74% | 99.99% ---------+------------+-------------------- 100000 | 53.37% | 99.99% ---------+------------+-------------------- 1000000 | 18.82% | 99.82% ---------+------------+--------------------
Beta
P | FULL LN | Professional subnet ------+-----------+-------------------- 99.9% | 0 | 168796 ------+-----------+-------------------- 99.0% | 0 | 2717349 ------+-----------+-------------------- 97.5% | 37 | 4303082 ------+-----------+-------------------- 90.0% | 2904 | 7728877 ------+-----------+-------------------- 80.0% | 13610 | 11114169 ------+-----------+-------------------- 50.0% | 96065 | 26124278 ------+-----------+-------------------- 33.9% | 293410 | 40540338 ------+-----------+--------------------
Expected Service level
P in the full network & professional subnet for various target amountsamount | FULL LN | Professional subnet ---------+------------+-------------------- 1000 | 93.16% | 99.97% ---------+------------+-------------------- 10000 | 82.67% | 99.96% ---------+------------+-------------------- 100000 | 48.25% | 99.93% ---------+------------+-------------------- 1000000 | 17.37% | 99.72% ---------+------------+--------------------
Network Stats
Full Network: =============================== Number of Nodes: 12497 Number of Edges: 50551.0 Total Capacity: 4904 BTC Average Liquidity per node: 39.0M sats Average node degree: 4.0 Density: 0.0006 Professional Network: =============================== Number of Nodes: 1009 Number of Edges: 16998.0 Total Capacity: 3309 BTC Average Liquidity per node: 328.0M sats Average node degree: 16.8 Density: 0.0334
reply